TCT 2019 | AUGUSTUS ACS: Apixaban vs. Warfarin and Aspirin vs. Placebo in AF and ACS

Courtesy of SBHCI.

The safety and efficacy of antithrombotic and antiplatelet treatments in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with acute coronary syndrome (who receive medical treatment or angioplasty) may vary from that in patients undergoing elective treatment.

Highlights TCT 2019

At 14 days from elective angioplasty or hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, patients were randomized in a 2×2 factorial trial to apixaban vs. warfarin and aspirin vs. placebo; additionally, they all received a P2Y12 inhibitor for the first 6 months. Patients admitted due to acute coronary syndrome received angioplasty or medical treatment at the discretion of the treating physician.

Patients randomized to apixaban received 5 mg every/12 h unless they met two of the three risk criteria (age >80 years, weight <60 kg or creatinine 1.5 mg/dL); in that case, the dose was 2.5 mg every/12 h. Patients randomized to warfarin had a target INR between 2 and 3. Both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies were started within 24 h from the randomization, and their duration was 6 months.


Read also: TCT 2019 | IDEAL-LM: Bioabsorbable Polymer DES vs. Permanent Polymer DES for Left Main Stenosis.


Events were analyzed according to three possible scenarios: clinically-treated acute coronary syndrome, angioplasty-treated acute coronary syndrome, and elective angioplasty.

Of the 4614 patients included, about 1097 (23.9%) were admitted due to acute coronary syndrome and underwent medical treatment, 1714 (37.3%) were admitted due to acute coronary syndrome and underwent angioplasty, and 1784 (38.8%) underwent elective angioplasty.

Compared with warfarin, apixaban reduced the number of major bleeding events in all clinical scenarios, with the same rate of ischemic events.

Aspirin patients had higher rates of bleeding in all clinical scenarios, with the same rate of ischemic events as placebo patients.

Conclusion

An antithrombotic regime with apixaban plus a P2Y12 inhibitor without aspirin was safer and just as effective in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with acute coronary syndrome receiving medical treatment or angioplasty when compared with patients who undergo elective angioplasty.

Courtesy of SBHCI.

Link to the SBHCI publication HERE

augustus-stephan

Original Title: AUGUSTUS ACS: A 2×2 Factorial Randomized Trial of Apixaban vs. Warfarin and Aspirin vs. Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Author of the Original Title: Stephan Windecker.



Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...