TCT 2019 | AUGUSTUS ACS: Apixaban vs. Warfarin and Aspirin vs. Placebo in AF and ACS

Courtesy of SBHCI.

The safety and efficacy of antithrombotic and antiplatelet treatments in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with acute coronary syndrome (who receive medical treatment or angioplasty) may vary from that in patients undergoing elective treatment.

Highlights TCT 2019

At 14 days from elective angioplasty or hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, patients were randomized in a 2×2 factorial trial to apixaban vs. warfarin and aspirin vs. placebo; additionally, they all received a P2Y12 inhibitor for the first 6 months. Patients admitted due to acute coronary syndrome received angioplasty or medical treatment at the discretion of the treating physician.

Patients randomized to apixaban received 5 mg every/12 h unless they met two of the three risk criteria (age >80 years, weight <60 kg or creatinine 1.5 mg/dL); in that case, the dose was 2.5 mg every/12 h. Patients randomized to warfarin had a target INR between 2 and 3. Both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies were started within 24 h from the randomization, and their duration was 6 months.


Read also: TCT 2019 | IDEAL-LM: Bioabsorbable Polymer DES vs. Permanent Polymer DES for Left Main Stenosis.


Events were analyzed according to three possible scenarios: clinically-treated acute coronary syndrome, angioplasty-treated acute coronary syndrome, and elective angioplasty.

Of the 4614 patients included, about 1097 (23.9%) were admitted due to acute coronary syndrome and underwent medical treatment, 1714 (37.3%) were admitted due to acute coronary syndrome and underwent angioplasty, and 1784 (38.8%) underwent elective angioplasty.

Compared with warfarin, apixaban reduced the number of major bleeding events in all clinical scenarios, with the same rate of ischemic events.

Aspirin patients had higher rates of bleeding in all clinical scenarios, with the same rate of ischemic events as placebo patients.

Conclusion

An antithrombotic regime with apixaban plus a P2Y12 inhibitor without aspirin was safer and just as effective in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted with acute coronary syndrome receiving medical treatment or angioplasty when compared with patients who undergo elective angioplasty.

Courtesy of SBHCI.

Link to the SBHCI publication HERE

augustus-stephan

Original Title: AUGUSTUS ACS: A 2×2 Factorial Randomized Trial of Apixaban vs. Warfarin and Aspirin vs. Placebo in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Author of the Original Title: Stephan Windecker.



Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | Extended follow-up of the TRI-FR study: Edge-to-edge percutaneous repair in isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with chronic systemic venous congestion, recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure (HF), and a significant deterioration in quality of...