AHA 2019 | GALILEO-4D: Rivaroxaban in the Prevention of Post TAVR Valve Thickening and Thrombosis

This sub study of the GALILEO specifically looked at valve thickening and reduced leaflet motion after TAVR documented with 4D CT. Whether anticoagulation with rivaroxaban might reduce or prevent this phenomenon remained unanswered. 

AHA 2019 | GALILEO-4D:  rivaroxabán y prevención de engrosamiento y trombosis de las valvas post TAVI

Patients receiving the same anticoagulation scheme than the general study’s (rivaroxaban + aspirin vs. aspirin + clopidogrel) were assessed by 4D CT at 90±15 days after randomization. Primary end point was percentage of patients with at least one leaflet with reduced motion. Valve thickening was also assessed.

The study included 231 patients; 2.1% in the rivaroxaban group showed leaflet motion reduction in at least one valve vs. 10.9% in the antiplatelet antiaggregation group (p=0.01).


Read also: AHA 2019 | ISCHEMIA: The Invasive Approach (PCI or Surgery) Results Similar to Optimal Medical Treatment.


Thickening of at least one valve was observed in 12.4% of the rivaroxaban group vs. 32.4% in the antiplatelet antiaggregation group. 

Despite the above mentioned, in the general GALILEO study, the risk of death, thrombotic events and bleeding resulted higher in patients receiving rivaroxaban.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing TAVR with no formal anticoagulation indication, indicating rivaroxaban vs. antiplatelet antiaggregation was shown more effective in the prevention of valve motion subclinical abnormalities. However, the general study showed rivaroxaban was associated to higher mortality, thrombosis and bleeding rates. 

galileo-4d-aha2019

Original Title: Reduced Leaflet Motion after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement.

Reference: Ole De Backer et al. Presentado en el congreso AHA 2019 y publicado simultáneamente en NEJM.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....