AHA 2019 | RECOVERY: Early Surgery in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

This small randomized study heated the debate about when to intervene aortic stenosis (AS). Putting off surgical valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with asymptomatic AS and waiting for symptom onset with conservative care increased periprocedural risk and all cause cardiovascular death.  

AHA 2019 | RECOVERY: Cirugía precoz en estenosis aórtica severa asintomática

This study presented by Dr Duk-Hyun Kang during AHA 2019 scientific sessions (simultaneously published in NEJM) supports the idea of preventive valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis.

The RECOVERY randomized 145 asymptomatic patients with severe AS (valve area ≤0.75 cm² and peak systolic velocity ≥ 4.5 m/seg or mean gradient ≥ 50 mmHg) of 4 hospitals in Korea to early surgery (within 2 months) vs waiting for symptom onset with conventional care.

 


Read also: AHA 2019 | GALILEO-4D: Rivaroxaban in the Prevention of Post TAVR Valve Thickening and Thrombosis.


Surgery was successful in the 72 patients who received it, with 0 mortality. 74% of patients under conventional care wound up receiving TAVR or SAVR for symptom onset at follow-up (mean time between randomization and symptom onset was 700 days). This group showed no periprocedural mortality as well. 

After over 6 years, cardiovascular mortality was significantly lower in the early intervention group (1% vs 15%; HR 0.09; CI 95% 0.01-0.67). All-cause mortality also resulted lower (7% vs 21%; HR 0.33; CI 95% 0.12-0.90).

Valvulopathy definition values were very strict. Stenosis was quite severe, which is why many patients were most likely self-limited rather than asymptomatic, in addition to having very low surgical risk. 

As regards modifying guideline recommendations, we still ought to wait for the outcomes of ongoing randomized studies such as the EARLY TAVR.

recovery-aha2019

Original Title: Early surgery or conservative care for asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Reference: Kang D-H et al. Presentado en las sesiones científicas del congreso AHA 2019 y publicado simultáneamente en NEJM.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...