Chronic Inflammation, Coronary Artery Disease and Cancer: Same Coin, Different Sides

Low grade inflammation shown by elevated plasma concentrations of high-sensitive C-reactive protein are a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. There is also evidence to support low grade inflammation could be related to higher risk of cancer. 

Inflamación crónica, enfermedad coronaria y cáncer: distintas caras de una misma moneda

This prospective study evaluated the relation between low grade systemic inflammation and the risk of cancer in patients with stable CAD. 

It included 7178 patients with stable CAD patients and ≤10 mg/l plasma concentration of C reactive protein followed up for 8.3 years.

The concentration of C reactive protein was associated to cancer risk (HR 1.35; CI 95% 1.10 to 1.65). This was especially true for lung cancer, regardless histopathological subtype, C reactive protein levels tripled the risk of cancer (HR 3.39; CI 95% 2.02 to 5.69).


Read also: Skipping Breakfast and Cardiovascular Risk.


Incidence of epithelial neoplasms, especially squamous cell neoplasms, were related to CRP concentration. 

There was no effect change between smokers and ex-smokers, regardless how long had passed since they stopped smoking. 

Conclusion

Low grade chronic inflammation measured by C reactive protein concentration ≤10 mg/l in stable CAD patients increase the risk of cancer, especially lung cancer. 

2020-01-17-ehz587-libre

Original Title: The relation between systemic inflammation and incident cancer in patients with stable cardiovascular disease: a cohort study.

Reference: Cilie C. van’t Klooster et al. European Heart Journal (2019) 40, 3901–3909.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....