Virtual ACC 2020 | Colchicine After Infarction: Good Results and Cost-Effectiveness

Low doses of colchicine reduce the risk of ischemic events after an acute myocardial infarction, according to the COLCOT trial, originally presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) 2019 Scientific Session and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The new information featured at the virtual ACC 2020 refers to its cost-effectiveness.

Colchicina post infarto

Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug indicated for gout and pericarditis, but its price hiked (at least in the United States) since the publication of COLCOT last year.

The anti-inflammatory approach for cardiovascular disease has been researched for years now. Researchers attempted to prove the concept with pricey monoclonal antibodies, and last year obtained the desired effect with a drug that was available for a few cents.

The new analysis presented at the virtual ACC 2020 included a cost model for a 20-year period (which would account for a lifetime, in the case of a patient after their first infarction).


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | More data from ISCHEMIA: Women with More Symptoms but Less Ischemia.


Low-dose colchicine plus optimal medical treatment after an infarction reduce patient healthcare costs in 47% of cases during the in-trial period and in 69% if we consider the rest of their life.

Original Title: Cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine after myocardial infarction in the COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT).

Reference: Samuel M et al. ACC 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....