Virtual ACC 2020 | TWILIGHT-COMPLEX: Ticagrelor Monotherapy in the Most “Dangerous” Angioplasties

The original TWILIGHT findings in more than 9000 patients who underwent angioplasty were presented last year at TCT and showed a 3.1% absolute risk reduction in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding with no increase in death, infarction, or stroke in patients who received ticagrelor and placebo compared with patients who received ticagrelor and aspirin. All patients had previously received dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months and had not experienced any bleeding or thrombotic events during that period of time.

Now, the TWILIGHT-COMPLEX trial is presented at the virtual ACC 2020 virtual while simultaneously published in J Am Coll Cardiol. This study focused on 2343 patients from the original TWILIGHT trial, who underwent complex angioplasty defined as: 3 vessels treated (9.1%), ≥3 lesions treated (29.9%), total stent length >60 mm (51.8%), bifurcation lesion with 2 stents implanted (10.7%); use of any atherectomy device (10.4%), left main disease (15.1%), venous or arterial bypass graft (6.9%), and chronic total occlusion (19%).

Compared with the main TWILIGHT population, these patients were older and more likely to have chronic kidney disease or anemia, and present acute coronary syndrome.

The primary endpoint of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was 4.2% in patients with complex angioplasty in the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. 7.7% in patients in the dual antiplatelet therapy group (a similar reduction to that experienced by patients who underwent noncomplex angioplasty). A similar finding was observed for major (BARC 3 to 5) bleeding only.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | First Results of Evolut in Low-Risk Bicuspid Valves.


Just like in the general population, there were also no differences in death, infarction, or stroke between ticagrelor monotherapy and dual antiplatelet therapy, and the same happened with definite/probable thrombosis.

Original Title: Ticagrelor with aspirin or alone after complex PCI: the TWILIGHT-COMPLEX analysis.

Reference: Dangas G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en el ACC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...