Cardiovascular Sequelae Associated with COVID-19

Myocardial injury, as defined by an increased troponin level, can occur due to both ischemic and nonischemic processes. Myocarditis would be an example of a nonischemic event.

Secuelas cardiovasculares COVID-19

A severe, acute respiratory infection causing hypoxia, especially due to COVID-19, can cause this myocardial injury.

Elevated troponin levels have been described in patients infected with COVID-19, with significant differences between patients who died during hospitalization and those who survived to discharge.

A recent meta-analysis of 4 studies showed that elevated troponin levels were higher in patients who suffered severe COVID-19-related illness compared with infected patients whose clinical course was mild.

Reports even suggest that myocardial injury does not only include elevation of cardiac biomarkers over the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit, but also electrocardiographic and echocardiographic alterations. This scenario is highly prevalent in patients with severe disease and worse prognosis.


Read also: Management of Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic.


Cohort studies in China estimate that such injury occurs in 7% to 17% of hospitalized patients. Additionally, it is much more significant in patients who required intensive care (22.2% vs. 2% in mild cases; p < 0.001) and even more so among patients who died (59% vs. 1%; p < 0.001).

These troponin levels can be exacerbated in patients with renal insufficiency.

Prior studies on other coronavirus species (MERS-CoV) have demonstrated evidence of acute myocarditis in magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial inflammation and damage have been reported with COVID-19.


Read also: In Favor of the Use of Thrombolytics in Pandemic Times.


Besides type II infarction cases (due to supply and demand mismatch), we have patients with “classic” cardiovascular manifestations.

The profound inflammatory response and hemodynamic changes may trigger atherosclerotic plaque rupture, and a subsequent type I infarction, in susceptible patients.

There is prior evidence indicating that, in patients with influenza or non-influenza-related viral infections (including those due to other coronavirus species), the risk for acute myocardial infarction can be multiplied several times over.


Read also: Always in Favor of Primary Angioplasty, Even in the Pandemic Era.


Another problem related to the current pandemic is potential overlapping symptomatology between acute coronary syndromes and COVID-19 infection, including electrocardiographic changes. Up to half of the patients infected with COVID-19 experiencing angina symptoms and electrocardiographic changes who were brought to the cath lab had no obvious culprit lesion.

Título original: Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients, Health Care Workers, and Health Systems During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Referencia: Elissa Driggin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.031.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...

Experience with the intra-annular self-expanding Navitor valve: data from the STS/ACC TVT registry

The expansion of TAVI, with the introduction of new-generation devices, has prioritized not only periprocedural safety, but also the preservation of coronary access, more...