Cardiovascular Sequelae Associated with COVID-19

Myocardial injury, as defined by an increased troponin level, can occur due to both ischemic and nonischemic processes. Myocarditis would be an example of a nonischemic event.

Secuelas cardiovasculares COVID-19

A severe, acute respiratory infection causing hypoxia, especially due to COVID-19, can cause this myocardial injury.

Elevated troponin levels have been described in patients infected with COVID-19, with significant differences between patients who died during hospitalization and those who survived to discharge.

A recent meta-analysis of 4 studies showed that elevated troponin levels were higher in patients who suffered severe COVID-19-related illness compared with infected patients whose clinical course was mild.

Reports even suggest that myocardial injury does not only include elevation of cardiac biomarkers over the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit, but also electrocardiographic and echocardiographic alterations. This scenario is highly prevalent in patients with severe disease and worse prognosis.


Read also: Management of Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic.


Cohort studies in China estimate that such injury occurs in 7% to 17% of hospitalized patients. Additionally, it is much more significant in patients who required intensive care (22.2% vs. 2% in mild cases; p < 0.001) and even more so among patients who died (59% vs. 1%; p < 0.001).

These troponin levels can be exacerbated in patients with renal insufficiency.

Prior studies on other coronavirus species (MERS-CoV) have demonstrated evidence of acute myocarditis in magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial inflammation and damage have been reported with COVID-19.


Read also: In Favor of the Use of Thrombolytics in Pandemic Times.


Besides type II infarction cases (due to supply and demand mismatch), we have patients with “classic” cardiovascular manifestations.

The profound inflammatory response and hemodynamic changes may trigger atherosclerotic plaque rupture, and a subsequent type I infarction, in susceptible patients.

There is prior evidence indicating that, in patients with influenza or non-influenza-related viral infections (including those due to other coronavirus species), the risk for acute myocardial infarction can be multiplied several times over.


Read also: Always in Favor of Primary Angioplasty, Even in the Pandemic Era.


Another problem related to the current pandemic is potential overlapping symptomatology between acute coronary syndromes and COVID-19 infection, including electrocardiographic changes. Up to half of the patients infected with COVID-19 experiencing angina symptoms and electrocardiographic changes who were brought to the cath lab had no obvious culprit lesion.

Título original: Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients, Health Care Workers, and Health Systems During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Referencia: Elissa Driggin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.031.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...