Post-MI Colchicine: Cost-Effective with Good Results

Low colchicine doses reduce the risk of post-AMI ischemic events according to the COLCOT trial, originally presented at AHA 2019 scientific sessions, and simultaneously published in NEJM. The new information delivered at the virtual ACC 2020 addresses its cost-effectiveness.

Colchicina post infarto: buenos resultados y costo-efectivo

Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug indicated in the treatment of gout and pericarditis, but its price skyrocketed last year, at least in the US, after the COLCOT came out. 

The inflammatory theory has been looked into for years now, in the context of CAD.  The concept had often been tested with costly monoclonal antibodies and, since last year, the effect was finally achieved with a drug worth cents. 

The new analysis presented at the virtual ACC 2020 carries out a cost model for a 20-year period (for a lifetime in patients after their first MI). 

Los colchicine doses in addition to optimal medical treatment after a MI reduce healthcare costs by 47% for the in-trial period, and by 69% when we consider the rest of a patient’s life. 

Original Title: Cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine after myocardial infarction in the COLchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT).

Reference: Samuel M et al. ACC 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...