Estimating the Risk of Infection for Healthcare Personnel

Roughly one out of every 100 healthcare workers at hospitals receiving COVID-19 patients become infected. Statistics are not uniform for all corners of earth, and they do not indicate that being on the front line necessarily entails higher risk.

Coronavirus y corazón ¿Cómo deben prepararse los cardiólogos?

A large analysis conducted in the initial epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic (Wuhan, China) showed that 110 of 9684 healthcare workers (1.1%) tested positive for the new virus. Only 17 of those 110 subjects worked on the front line, which translates into an infection rate of 0.5% among this group.

Paradoxically, the infection rate was higher among those not on the front line. As a matter of fact, the risk of infection was 16 times greater among nurses who were not first-line staff.

This is likely explained by insufficient protective measures and a sense of being out of danger experienced by staff not directly tending to infected patients.

Among healthcare workers, 85% did not experience severe disease. Over half of them experienced common symptoms [myalgia or fatigue (60%), coughing (56.4%), sore throat (50%), and muscle aches (45.5%)].


Read also: Priorities in the Cath Lab to Escape COVID-19 Tsunami.


A similar study was conducted in the Netherlands, and the infection rate was 1% among a total of 9705 healthcare workers. Only half of them experienced fever and another mild associated symptom.

This is a huge problem hindering disease control, since most healthcare workers are young, with very mild symptoms (if any at all). Beyond their symptoms and their own health risk (which is extremely low), the main issue is that these workers could act as vectors for low-risk hospital areas or areas assigned to non-infected patients.

contagio-en-trabajadores-de-la-salud contagio-en-trabajadores-de-la-salud-2 contagio-en-trabajadores-de-la-salud-3

Título original: Estimating coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk in health care workers.

Referencia: Cheng V et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e209687.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...