ESC 2020 | Atrial Fibrillation and Rhythm Control: A Matter of Time?

Early rhythm control therapy in patients recently diagnosed with atrial fibrillation reduces the risk of cardiovascular events compared against the usual treatment of frequency control. 

ESC 2020 | Fibrilación auricular y control del ritmo ¿Una cuestión de tiempo?

These data come from the EAST-AFNET 4 trial recently presented at ESC 2020, simultaneously published in NEJM.

These data suggest that we should offer patients early rhythm control therapy to prevent future cardiovascular complications.

Prior studies, such as the AFFIRM, had not been able to identify the benefits of early rhythm control against ventricular response control therapy in the prevention of hard events. 

The EAST-AFNET 4 randomized 2789 patients to early rhythm control (with drugs and/or ablation) vs. standard treatment (ventricular response control).


Read also: Can Aspirin Use Be Interrupted After Angioplasty?


In the control group, the drugs most often used were flecainide followed by amiodarone. Ablation was used in 8% initially but reached nearly 20% after 2 years. 

The trial was stopped after mean 5.1-year followup after the interim analyzis confirmed efficacy in the rhythm control arm.  Primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, stroke and hospitalization for cardiac failure or cardiac event) was reduced 20% in relative terms (HR 0.79; CI 95% 0.66 to 0.94; p=0.005). This equals 3.9 every 100 patients vs. 5 every 100 patients. All primary end point components showed the same trend when analyzed separately. 

Safety end points also resulted similar in both arms, even though initially they were more frequent in the rhythm control arm, which was expected of a study involving an invasive procedure (with potential complications) with ablation.

east-afnet-4-full

Original Title: Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Reference: P. Kirchhof et al. New Engl J Med. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en el congreso ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...