TCT 2020 | Using OCT to Detect Vulnerable Plaque even with Negative FFR

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has proven useful in diabetic patients, even those with negative FFR. 

TCT OCT placas vulnerables incluso con FFR negativo

These findings make us rethink the ischemia and functional revascularization paradigm vs. the anatomical findings of vulnerable plaque. 

Diabetic patients with lesions that might be deferred base don FFR might benefit from OCT to find in these plaques certain risk features that will make them prone to developing events. 

This study called COMBINE OCT-FFR included 547 patients assessed with FFR and revascularized according to the standard cutoff value of 0.8. Patients with negative lesions (>0.8) were assessed with OCT and classified in vulnerable or not vulnerable according to fibroatheroma cap thickness. 


Read also: Further Evidence in Favor of Non-Invasive Vasospasm Diagnosis.


Primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, vessel related MI, clinically justified revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina. 

After 18-month followup, there was a 5-fold higher event rate in patients with vulnerable lesions due to thin-cap fibro-atheroma defined by OCT (13.3% vs 3.1%; HR 4.7).

There were no differences in events in patients undergoing revascularization based on FFR.


Read also: Diabetes Could Decide between Ticagrelor and Prasugrel.


According to Dr. Kedhi, this study has shown for the first time that diabetic patients might benefit from revascularization of certain lesions despite their not being functionally significative.

These conclusions have had different repercussion among panelists, which clearly shows controversy.

Original Title: Combined optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve assessment to better predict adverse event outcomes in DM patients.

Reference: Presentado por Kedhi E. en el TCT 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...