Axillary Access for Microaxial Ventricular Support Device Placement

There is little evidence in support of the axillary access for counterpulsation balloon insertion, but this evidence is null when it comes to microaxial ventricular support device placement (the Impella device family). 

Acceso percutáneo axilar para dispositivos de asistencia ventricular

Clinical indication of short-term mechanical circulatory support devices has been on the rise. Many patients present suboptimal iliofemoral access or early mobilization is required. 

Axillary artery access is an option for these patients, and this is the rationale behind the ARMS Registry (Axillary Access Registry to Monitor Safety) which prospectively included patients to analyze the feasibility and safety of this procedure. 

A total 102 patients from 10 centers were included. Successful device implantation was 98% and support lasted mean 2 days (range 0-35 days). Postprocedural access site hematoma or bleeding was noted in 9 patients. 

Major complications included 10 bleedings and one stroke. Minor complications included 3 patients presenting, after several days, C8 tingling consistent with brachial plexus related symptoms. 


Read also: Intravascular Imaging: A Universal Approach for Angioplasty Optimization.


Device explantation was done with closure devices alone in 61% of cases, stent grafts in 17%, balloon tamponade facilitated closure in 15%, and planned surgical explant in 5%. 

Support duration was independently associated with vascular complications and increased complications by 1.1% per day.

Conclusion

Percutaneous axillary access of microaxial support pumps (Impella family) appears feasible with acceptable rates of bleeding, despite the early experience.

Original Title: Percutaneous Axillary Access for Placement of Microaxial Ventricular Support Devices. The Axillary Access Registry to Monitor Safety (ARMS).

Reference: James M. McCabe et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009657. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009657.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...