Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor reduces ischemic risk in patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction, but it increases the risk of bleeding. Keeping a delicate balance is paramount when prescribing long-term ticagrelor to patients with a history of infarction.

Beneficio clínico neto del ticagrelor a largo plazo

The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 study randomized 21,162 patients with a history of infarction on a 1:1:1 ratio: some received ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day, others ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day, and others received a placebo. All participants also took aspirin with their daily intake. The 60-mg dose of ticagrelor was already approved to be used chronically.

The final endpoints were TIMI major and minor bleeding. The causes of bleeding were categorized by site and etiology, and independent predictors were identified.

After a 3-year follow-up, ticagrelor 60 mg increased the risk of major and minor bleeding by 2% compared with placebo (1.4 % placebo versus 3.4 % ticagrelor).

This difference in bleeding was driven primarily by spontaneous gastrointestinal bleeds. A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and the presence of anemia were independent predictors of bleeding, but not of ischemic risk. 


Read also: Ticagrelor: Yet Another Pleiotropic Effect?


Patients with at least 1 risk predictor had 3-fold higher rates of bleeding with ticagrelor 60 mg compared with subjects who had none (absolute risk increase, 4.4% versus 1.5%; p = 0.01).

Patients with neither predictor had a more favorable benefit profile with ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day plus low-dose aspirin compared with placebo combined with aspirin. Their benefit profile included a lower mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.96; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

In patients with prior myocardial infarction, bleeding is mainly caused by gastrointestinal reasons.

A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or the presence of anemia identified patients at a higher risk of bleeding. Patients with neither of these factors benefited from ticagrelor, even in terms of mortality.

Original Title: Predictors, Type, and Impact of Bleeding on the Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor in Stable Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: Giulia Magnani et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e017008. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017008.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...