Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor reduces ischemic risk in patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction, but it increases the risk of bleeding. Keeping a delicate balance is paramount when prescribing long-term ticagrelor to patients with a history of infarction.

Beneficio clínico neto del ticagrelor a largo plazo

The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 study randomized 21,162 patients with a history of infarction on a 1:1:1 ratio: some received ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day, others ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day, and others received a placebo. All participants also took aspirin with their daily intake. The 60-mg dose of ticagrelor was already approved to be used chronically.

The final endpoints were TIMI major and minor bleeding. The causes of bleeding were categorized by site and etiology, and independent predictors were identified.

After a 3-year follow-up, ticagrelor 60 mg increased the risk of major and minor bleeding by 2% compared with placebo (1.4 % placebo versus 3.4 % ticagrelor).

This difference in bleeding was driven primarily by spontaneous gastrointestinal bleeds. A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and the presence of anemia were independent predictors of bleeding, but not of ischemic risk. 


Read also: Ticagrelor: Yet Another Pleiotropic Effect?


Patients with at least 1 risk predictor had 3-fold higher rates of bleeding with ticagrelor 60 mg compared with subjects who had none (absolute risk increase, 4.4% versus 1.5%; p = 0.01).

Patients with neither predictor had a more favorable benefit profile with ticagrelor 60 mg twice a day plus low-dose aspirin compared with placebo combined with aspirin. Their benefit profile included a lower mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.96; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

In patients with prior myocardial infarction, bleeding is mainly caused by gastrointestinal reasons.

A history of spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or the presence of anemia identified patients at a higher risk of bleeding. Patients with neither of these factors benefited from ticagrelor, even in terms of mortality.

Original Title: Predictors, Type, and Impact of Bleeding on the Net Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Ticagrelor in Stable Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: Giulia Magnani et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e017008. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017008.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...