ACC 2021 | Emergent CABG for acute MI: Benefits Despite Risk

The latest figures show a lower number of emergency CABG for acute MI, and in turn increased primary PCI. 

ACC 2021 | Cirugía de emergencia en el infarto: beneficios a pesar del alto riesgo

The combination of surgeons not willing to take risks and interventional cardiologists empowered to treat practically any lesion has resulted in fewer patients receiving emergency CABG. Only a few years ago, interventional cardiologists at least had the “courtesy” to agree on a treatment strategy with the surgeon on call. Several years of choosing PCI over CABG have granted interventionists clearance to bypass surgeons and directly proceed to percutaneous intervention, practically in every center. 

This study presented today at ACC 2021 simultaneously published in JAHA, shows the figures behind the above statements. Comparing the years 2000 and 2017, emergency CABG saw a 90% reduction. 

It is also clear that surgical techniques and post operatory care have improved in the same period. This has contributed to keep a clear benefit in terms of mortality, despite volume reduction and case selection. 

When comparing patients undergoing surgery in the first part of the study vs the second part, some interesting information becomes clear


Read also: ACC 2021 | LAAOS III: Appendage Closure During Central Vascular Surgery.


Patients treated in the second, most recent period, were more frequently non-STEMI cases (80.5% vs 56.1%), more often presented non-cardiac multiorgan failure (26.1% vs 8.4%), presented cardiogenic shock (11.5% vs 6.4%) and received mechanical circulatory support (19.8% vs 18.7%; p< 0.001 for all comparisons). 

Despite all the above mentioned, mortality in these periods resulted similar (5.3% in 2000 vs 3.6% in 2017).

Original Title: Temporal trends, clinical characteristics and outcomes of emergent coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction in the United States.

Reference: Patlolla SH et al. Presentado en el congreso de la ACC 2021 y publicado simultáneamente en J Am Heart Assoc.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...