ACC 2021 | RAPID-TnT: Usefulness of High-Sensitivity Ultra-Fast Troponin T

Patients under evaluation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without clear ischemia signs in an electrocardiogram find no benefit in a 0/1-hour high-sensitivity troponin T (ultra-fast) protocol compared with the conventional 0/3-hour protocol.

ACC 2021 | RAPID-TnT: Utilidad de la troponina T ultrasensible y ultra rápida

These data come from the RAPID-TnT trial presented during the scientific sessions at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2021 Congress, simultaneously published in Circulation.

RAPID-TnT enrolled 3378 patients with suspected ACS and randomized them to a fast-testing protocol (0/1 hour) with a 5th generation high-sensitivity troponin T (detection limit: 4 ng/L) vs. the standard protocol (0/3 hour; detection limit: 29 ng/l). 

The hypothesis of the study was that having this sensitive information faster could aid decision-making and ultimately impact events, something that ultimately did not happen.

The ultra-fast protocol was associated with fewer functional testing and more coronary angiography and revascularization, but it did not translate into differences in mortality or infarction at one year compared with the conventional protocol (5.0% vs. 3.8%; hazard ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.83).


Read also: ACC 2021 | Relive Renal Denervation with RADIANCE-HTN TRIO.


Esta información llena un vacío que existía en términos de velocidad de diagnóstico. Se especulaba que cuanto más rápido tuviéramos los datos mejor administraríamos los estudios complementarios y esto finalmente impactaría en eventos clínicos. 

RAPID-TnT

Original Title: Late outcomes of the RAPID-TnT RCT: a 0/1-hour high-sensitivity troponin T protocol in suspected ACS.

Reference: Lambrakis K et al. Presentado en el congreso de la ACC 2021 y publicado simultáneamente en Circulation. 2021;Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055009.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...