ACC 2021 | SAFE-PAD: Paclitaxel-Eluting Devices in Peripheral Disease

This work was conducted alongside the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate the association between all-cause mortality and paclitaxel-eluting devices in peripheral vascular disease.

SAFE-PAD: Dispositivos liberadores de paclitaxel en enfermedad periférica

According to data from SAFE-PAD, presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2021 Congress and simultaneously published in JAMA, there is no increase in mortality compared with conventional devices.

Mortality at a mean 2.7 years was 53.8% for patients with peripheral vascular disease treated with paclitaxel-eluting devices vs. 55.1% for those treated with non-eluting devices (pnon-inferiority < 0.001).

The first data on the possible association between these devices and mortality emerged in 2018, following the publication of a meta-analysis of several randomized studies.

According to that first research, mortality would increase between follow-up years two and three in patients with paclitaxel-eluting stents or balloons vs. conventional devices.


Read also: ACC 2021 | Sacubitril/Valsartan not Superior to Ramipril after AMI.


This prompted the FDA to convene an expert panel, which ultimately limited the use of these devices to patients at increased risk of restenosis or new interventions in femoropopliteal disease.

The SAFE-PAD study included 168,553 patients with peripheral vascular disease who underwent angioplasty between 2015 and 2018. After multiple analysis, no association with mortality could be established in the general population or the multiple pre-specified subgroups.

In fact, some subgroups showed an advantage in favor of paclitaxel eluting devices.


Read also: ACC 2021 | LAAOS III: Appendage Closure During Central Vascular Surgery.


Results from SAFE-PAD follow those from the recently published SWEDEPAD study.

One fact that emerges from this analysis is the high mortality rate of patients with peripheral vascular disease in daily clinical practice: over 50% in mortality at three years in both treatment arms, which highlights the pending effort in secondary prevention.

SAFE-PAD

Original Title: Longitudinal assessment of safety of femoropopliteal endovascular treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices among Medicare beneficiaries: the SAFE-PAD study.

Reference: Secemsky EA et al. Presentado en el congreso de la ACC 2021 y publicado simultáneamente en JAMA Intern Med. 2021. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2738.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

TCT 2024 | PEERLESS: Mechanical Thrombectomy with FlowTriever vs Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Intermediate Risk PTE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be the third cause of cardiovascular mortality. The current clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation in intermediate risk patients presenting right...

Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: To Revascularize or Not

At long term, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) can lead to hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac failure. Historically, these patients have been referred...

Endovascular Management of Chronic TEPH: Is Coronary Management Extrapolatable in This Scenario?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a condition that causes significant functional limitation. Its surgical treatment, known as pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), has improved the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...