Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine against COVID-19 in Teenagers

COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer/BioNTech had an excellent safety profile and remarkably high efficacy (100%) in teenagers.

vacuna de Pfizer/BioNTech contra el COVID-19 en adolescentes

The original study included patients ≥16 years of age and further study was needed for an even younger population that needed to go back to school. 

Same as in December 2020, NEJM was the magazine chosen to publish the good news about the population between 12 and 15.

The immune response of this population was analyzed vs. youngsters between 16 and 25. In addition, safety and efficacy was assessed for confirmed COVID-19 cases 7 days after the second dose. 

It included 2260 teenagers from several countries blindly randomized 1:1 to receiving the vaccine (n=1131) vs placebo (n=1129).

Like other age groups, adverse effects were transient and mild to moderate. Among them they found injection-site pain (79% to 86% of participants), fatigue (60% to 66%) and headache (55% to 65%). There were no major vaccine-related adverse events.


Read also: EuroPCR 2021 | CASTLE: Orsiro vs Xience Guided by Intravascular Imaging.


SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titers after the second dose reached non-inferiority and even resulted higher in the younger population compared against participants aged 16 to 25.

There were no COVID-19 cases 7 days after the second dose in the vaccinated population vs. 16 cases in the placebo group. This translates into 100% efficacy (CI 95%, 75.3 to 100) of the RNA based vaccine developed by Pfizer/BioNTech in the 12- to 15-year-old population.

Conclusion

In a population of 12- to 15-year-olds, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has a favorable safety profile, produces an even higher population immune response vs. other populations and is highly effective against COVID-19. 

nejmoa2107456

Original Title: Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Adolescents.

Reference: Robert W. Frenck, Jr et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 27. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107456. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is the Booster Dose Against COVID-19 Effective for All Ages?

The answer is incontrovertible: it is undeniably effective. For all ages, the confirmed COVID19 and severe case rates were significantly lower for patients who...

Pfizer Booster Dose Efficacy against Omicron

The BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech) has previously shown a 95% efficacy against COVID-19. This efficacy has been changing with the surge of new variants and,...

Once Again, the Omicron Variant Tests the Limits of Healthcare Systems, But with Hope

The latest significant COVID-19 variant, the Omicron, is again pushing healthcare systems around the world onto the verge of collapse, having reached over 300...

The Most Read Articles of 2021: COVID-19

A new year is coming to an end and at SOLACI we are going over the most read studies on our website, on COVID-19. Follow...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...