European Consensus on Antithrombotic Management in TAVR

All the controlled randomized evidence recently published called for an updated document on antithrombotic management in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Consenso europeo sobre manejo antitrombótico en el TAVI

While thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications have diminished over time—as both the technique and the devices have been perfected—, they still remain as common adverse events in TAVR. 

Recommendations in the 2017 European Guidelines were mostly based on expert opinions. 

This article is only a summary of the main aspects of the document. It is paramount to understand that choosing anti-thrombotic therapy in TAVR should be based not only on the procedure, but also on patient characteristics, comorbidities, and bleeding/thrombosis risk.

When planning the procedure:

  • Evaluating the risk of bleeding is mandatory.
  • Patients without indications for oral anticoagulation should start taking low-dose aspirin before the procedure.
  • Clopidogrel is an alternative if aspirin is contraindicated.

Read also: IVUS vs iFR for Left Main Decision Making.


During the procedure:

  • The decision to continue or interrupt vitamin K inhibitor or direct anticoagulant agents should be taken on a case by case basis.
  • When continuing vitamin K inhibition, the international normalized ratio should be below the therapeutic range (∼2).
  • Additional aspirin is not needed in the case of patients treated with oral anticoagulation.
  • Unfractionated heparin with activated clotting time of 250–300 s should be used.
  • Reversing the effect of unfractionated heparin with protamine is reasonable.
  • Bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative if unfractionated heparin is contraindicated.
  • Use of embolic protection devices is reasonable in patients at high risk of stroke.

After the procedure:

  • Continuous evaluation of the risk of bleeding is mandatory.
  • Low-dose aspirin is preferred for patients who do not need anticoagulation.
  • If anticoagulation is indicated for any other reason, it is sufficient to continue with this regimen alone—either vitamin K inhibitors or direct anticoagulant agents.
  • If, in addition to TAVR, the patient underwent coronary angioplasty, double platelet antiplatelet therapy will be necessary for one to three months (scheduled angioplasty) or for three to six months (acute coronary syndromes). This recommendation is based on the assumption that the vast majority of patients who undergo TAVR are deemed as patients at high risk of bleeding.

Original Title: Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a consensus document of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), in collaboration with the ESC Council on Valvular Heart Disease.

Reference: Jurrien ten Berg et al. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jun 14;42(23):2265-2269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab196.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...