Bifurcations: A Long Return Journey

When it looked like the simplest techniques reach the best outcomes, along came the DK Crush studies. Indeed, after the COVIS III results in bifurcations, it appeared we had started to retrace our steps back to the foundation. 

DKCRUSH-V: El tronco de la coronaria izquierda no es una bifurcación más

The purpose of this study was to compare long term outcomes of the remarkably simple 1-stent strategy to the main vessel (MV) with simple crossover alone vs. an additional side branch (SB) opening procedure with a second guidewire finalized with a kissing balloon.

Patients undergoing coronary PCI to a bifurcation (including left main) with the single stent strategy were included in this registry. 

2,194 patients were divided into the simple crossover–alone group (n=1.685, 76.8%) and the SB-opening group (n=509, 23.2%). Target lesion failure rate (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization) was assessed at a 5-year followup. 

The angiographic characteristics of patients in the SB-opening group with kissing balloon were more severe, even though lumen diameter resulted larger in this group. 

After 5 years, target lesion failure rate was similar between groups (7% vs 6.7%; p=0.947). 


Read also: A Headache for Cardiologists: Ischemia with Non-Obstructive Disease.


This was also true for the subgroup with left main lesion (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p=0.442) and lesions classified as Medina 1.1.1, 1.0.1 and 0.1.1 (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p=0.362). The latter are normally called true bifurcations. 

Conclusion

The remarkably simple 1-stent strategy to the main vessel with simple crossover alone showed long term comparable results to those obtained with an additional side branch opening procedure with a second guidewire finalized with a kissing balloon. 

j-jacasi-2021-04-002

Original title: 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening. COBIS III 

Reference: Cheol Hyun Lee et al. JACC: Asia 2021;1:53–64.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...