Are Antithrombotics Necessary in Outpatients after COVID-19?

According to this recent study (soon to be published in JAMA), antithrombotic therapy has no clinical benefits for outpatients with stable symptoms of COVID-19. 

¿Son necesarios los antitrombóticos luego del alta por COVID-19?

Both aspirin and apixaban in therapeutic or prophylactic doses did not reduce major cardiovascular events compared against placebo, though these events are rare, which makes it difficult to show any benefit. 

Researchers did observe a modest increase in bleeding. 

These findings came as a surprise, since any antithrombotic intervention was expected to affect the extremely high rate of thrombotic events (both venous and arterial) observed in COVID-19 patients.

The reason behind this lack of events might be in the chosen population: while the first wave affected mostly the elderly and those who had many comorbidities, the following waves hit younger and healthier patients. 

This study was set to enroll 7,000 clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19 patients. It stopped at mere 657 because of the amazingly low events rate. Patients were randomized to 4 groups: placebo, aspirin 81 mg, apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day (prophylaxis) and apixaban 5 mg twice a day (therapeutic).

There was no major bleeding. When considering any bleeding, only the therapeutic apixaban branch differed from the placebo branch. 


Read also: Hypertensive Patients: Maximizing Doses or Adding New Drugs.


Extrapolation and generalization of these outcomes was hindered by the low rate of events and the few patients infected with the Delta variant. In fact, there are at least 10 more ongoing studies on the same topic soon to be published. 

It’s just a matter of time for us to be able to throw more light onto this issue. 

Original Title: Effect of antithrombotic therapy on clinical outcomes in outpatients with clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19: the ACTIV-4B randomized clinical trial.

Reference: Jean M Connors et al. JAMA. 2021 Oct 11. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17272. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...