Are Antithrombotics Necessary in Outpatients after COVID-19?

According to this recent study (soon to be published in JAMA), antithrombotic therapy has no clinical benefits for outpatients with stable symptoms of COVID-19. 

¿Son necesarios los antitrombóticos luego del alta por COVID-19?

Both aspirin and apixaban in therapeutic or prophylactic doses did not reduce major cardiovascular events compared against placebo, though these events are rare, which makes it difficult to show any benefit. 

Researchers did observe a modest increase in bleeding. 

These findings came as a surprise, since any antithrombotic intervention was expected to affect the extremely high rate of thrombotic events (both venous and arterial) observed in COVID-19 patients.

The reason behind this lack of events might be in the chosen population: while the first wave affected mostly the elderly and those who had many comorbidities, the following waves hit younger and healthier patients. 

This study was set to enroll 7,000 clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19 patients. It stopped at mere 657 because of the amazingly low events rate. Patients were randomized to 4 groups: placebo, aspirin 81 mg, apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day (prophylaxis) and apixaban 5 mg twice a day (therapeutic).

There was no major bleeding. When considering any bleeding, only the therapeutic apixaban branch differed from the placebo branch. 


Read also: Hypertensive Patients: Maximizing Doses or Adding New Drugs.


Extrapolation and generalization of these outcomes was hindered by the low rate of events and the few patients infected with the Delta variant. In fact, there are at least 10 more ongoing studies on the same topic soon to be published. 

It’s just a matter of time for us to be able to throw more light onto this issue. 

Original Title: Effect of antithrombotic therapy on clinical outcomes in outpatients with clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19: the ACTIV-4B randomized clinical trial.

Reference: Jean M Connors et al. JAMA. 2021 Oct 11. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17272. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...