Are Antithrombotics Necessary in Outpatients after COVID-19?

According to this recent study (soon to be published in JAMA), antithrombotic therapy has no clinical benefits for outpatients with stable symptoms of COVID-19. 

¿Son necesarios los antitrombóticos luego del alta por COVID-19?

Both aspirin and apixaban in therapeutic or prophylactic doses did not reduce major cardiovascular events compared against placebo, though these events are rare, which makes it difficult to show any benefit. 

Researchers did observe a modest increase in bleeding. 

These findings came as a surprise, since any antithrombotic intervention was expected to affect the extremely high rate of thrombotic events (both venous and arterial) observed in COVID-19 patients.

The reason behind this lack of events might be in the chosen population: while the first wave affected mostly the elderly and those who had many comorbidities, the following waves hit younger and healthier patients. 

This study was set to enroll 7,000 clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19 patients. It stopped at mere 657 because of the amazingly low events rate. Patients were randomized to 4 groups: placebo, aspirin 81 mg, apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day (prophylaxis) and apixaban 5 mg twice a day (therapeutic).

There was no major bleeding. When considering any bleeding, only the therapeutic apixaban branch differed from the placebo branch. 


Read also: Hypertensive Patients: Maximizing Doses or Adding New Drugs.


Extrapolation and generalization of these outcomes was hindered by the low rate of events and the few patients infected with the Delta variant. In fact, there are at least 10 more ongoing studies on the same topic soon to be published. 

It’s just a matter of time for us to be able to throw more light onto this issue. 

Original Title: Effect of antithrombotic therapy on clinical outcomes in outpatients with clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19: the ACTIV-4B randomized clinical trial.

Reference: Jean M Connors et al. JAMA. 2021 Oct 11. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17272. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...