Are Antithrombotics Necessary in Outpatients after COVID-19?

According to this recent study (soon to be published in JAMA), antithrombotic therapy has no clinical benefits for outpatients with stable symptoms of COVID-19. 

¿Son necesarios los antitrombóticos luego del alta por COVID-19?

Both aspirin and apixaban in therapeutic or prophylactic doses did not reduce major cardiovascular events compared against placebo, though these events are rare, which makes it difficult to show any benefit. 

Researchers did observe a modest increase in bleeding. 

These findings came as a surprise, since any antithrombotic intervention was expected to affect the extremely high rate of thrombotic events (both venous and arterial) observed in COVID-19 patients.

The reason behind this lack of events might be in the chosen population: while the first wave affected mostly the elderly and those who had many comorbidities, the following waves hit younger and healthier patients. 

This study was set to enroll 7,000 clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19 patients. It stopped at mere 657 because of the amazingly low events rate. Patients were randomized to 4 groups: placebo, aspirin 81 mg, apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day (prophylaxis) and apixaban 5 mg twice a day (therapeutic).

There was no major bleeding. When considering any bleeding, only the therapeutic apixaban branch differed from the placebo branch. 


Read also: Hypertensive Patients: Maximizing Doses or Adding New Drugs.


Extrapolation and generalization of these outcomes was hindered by the low rate of events and the few patients infected with the Delta variant. In fact, there are at least 10 more ongoing studies on the same topic soon to be published. 

It’s just a matter of time for us to be able to throw more light onto this issue. 

Original Title: Effect of antithrombotic therapy on clinical outcomes in outpatients with clinically stable symptomatic COVID-19: the ACTIV-4B randomized clinical trial.

Reference: Jean M Connors et al. JAMA. 2021 Oct 11. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17272. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Ventricular Thrombus After STEMI

While the incidence of intracavitary thrombi after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has decreased thanks to optimized primary angioplasty times, some studies report rates of...

AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of...

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

STEACS and the Use of Bivalirudin vs. Heparin: In Search of BRIGHT-4 Outcomes

Various studies and registries have previously shown the impact of post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complications on the survival of patients with ST-segment elevation acute...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Edge-to-Edge Repair in Atrial Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has been associated with higher morbimortality and a negative impact on quality of life.  In most cases, its main cause is a...

Percutaneous Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation with K-CLIP

Roughly 4% of the adult population presents tricuspid regurgitation (TR), a condition that might progress to severe or worse end-organ function, associated to hospitalizations...

PULSE Registry Subanalysis: Radial vs. Femoral Secondary Access

In view of its lower complications rate, the transfemoral approach is the most used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), vs. alternative access sites....