Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Is Safer, Antiaggregant Monotherapy or De-Escalation?

For several years it has been shown that 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory for patients undergoing left main PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, though this strategy does reduce thrombotic events and mortality, it also causes undesirable bleeding events followed by hospitalization and antiaggregation interruption for a period of time. 

Síndromes coronarios agudos: ¿Qué es más seguro: monoterapia con antiagregante o De-Escalation?

A feasible strategy could be to interrupt one of the antiaggregants (be it aspirin -ASA- or P2Y12 inhibitor). The alternative could be to switch (De-Escalation) to a P2Y12 inhibitor of lower antiaggregation power (for example from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel) or to reduce dosage.

This question remains unanswered.

This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 50602 patients, and it compared short duration antiaggregation (SHORT DAPT) vs. de-escalation.

Mean age was 63, there was an important number of women and a percentage of diabetics that ranged between 22% and 26%. There were no differences in all-cause mortality. 

De-escalation reduced the risk of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07-2.21).

Read also: IVUS in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A New Requirement?

De-Escalation showed >95% probability to prevent NACE, MI, stroke, stent-thrombosis, and minor bleeding. However, it showed a very high rate of major bleeding. 

On the other hand, the SHORT DAPT approach showed better performance (>95%) in the prevention of major bleeding.

Conclusion

In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI there were no differences in all-cause mortality between SHORT DAPT and De-Escalation. De-Escalation reduced NACE risk, while SHORT DAPT reduced the risk of major bleeding. 

These data characterize 2 contemporary strategies to personalize the use of DAPT according to treatment goals and risk profile.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the SOLACI.org Editorial Board. 

Original Title: Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Reference: Claudio Laudani, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:268–277.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...