Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Is Safer, Antiaggregant Monotherapy or De-Escalation?

For several years it has been shown that 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory for patients undergoing left main PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, though this strategy does reduce thrombotic events and mortality, it also causes undesirable bleeding events followed by hospitalization and antiaggregation interruption for a period of time. 

Síndromes coronarios agudos: ¿Qué es más seguro: monoterapia con antiagregante o De-Escalation?

A feasible strategy could be to interrupt one of the antiaggregants (be it aspirin -ASA- or P2Y12 inhibitor). The alternative could be to switch (De-Escalation) to a P2Y12 inhibitor of lower antiaggregation power (for example from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel) or to reduce dosage.

This question remains unanswered.

This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 50602 patients, and it compared short duration antiaggregation (SHORT DAPT) vs. de-escalation.

Mean age was 63, there was an important number of women and a percentage of diabetics that ranged between 22% and 26%. There were no differences in all-cause mortality. 

De-escalation reduced the risk of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07-2.21).

Read also: IVUS in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A New Requirement?

De-Escalation showed >95% probability to prevent NACE, MI, stroke, stent-thrombosis, and minor bleeding. However, it showed a very high rate of major bleeding. 

On the other hand, the SHORT DAPT approach showed better performance (>95%) in the prevention of major bleeding.

Conclusion

In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI there were no differences in all-cause mortality between SHORT DAPT and De-Escalation. De-Escalation reduced NACE risk, while SHORT DAPT reduced the risk of major bleeding. 

These data characterize 2 contemporary strategies to personalize the use of DAPT according to treatment goals and risk profile.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the SOLACI.org Editorial Board. 

Original Title: Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Reference: Claudio Laudani, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:268–277.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

SCAI 2026 | SELUTION DeNovo subanalysis: Use of sirolimus-eluting balloon in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains the predominant strategy in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, in recent...

Calcified Nodules and Their Treatment with Rotational Atherectomy

Calcified nodules (CN) represent one of the most complex phenotypes to treat in coronary intervention. They are mainly associated with the need for repeat...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...