Is Epinephrine Superior to Adenosine in No-REFLOW?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome, no-reflow prevalence is 32%. Different drugs—such as adenosine, verapamil, nitroprusside, or nicardipine— have been used for its intracoronary treatment, thus resulting in arterial hypotension.

¿Es superior la epinefrina a la adenosina en No-REFLOW?

The aim of this randomized study was to determine the effectiveness of the use of intracoronary epinephrine vs. adenosine in normotensive patients.

The primary endpoint was improvement in coronary flow assessed by TIMI flow, frame count, and myocardial blush. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital death, short-term death, and major cardiovascular events.

A total of 201 patients were included; 101 received epinephrine and 100, adenosine. The mean age was 57 years, most patients were male and hypertensive, and almost half of them had diabetes. The most frequent form of presentation in both groups was STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) and the anterior descending artery was the most frequently affected artery. Pre-treatment TIMI I flow was present in 60% of patients.

Effectiveness was superior in patients who received epinephrine administration with TIMI III end flow (90.1% vs. 78%, p = 0.019), while there were no significant differences in myocardial blush or the secondary endpoint.

Read also: Bypass Grafting and Native Coronary Artery Disease Activity.

Epinephrine was well tolerated with few major adverse effects (2% of patients suffered from ventricular tachycardia).

Conclusion

Epinephrine is relatively safe for use in no-reflow in patients with normotension in acute coronary syndrome. The significant increase in post-treatment TIMI III flow, with a non-significant improvement in myocardial blush, makes intracoronary epinephrine a more effective alternative to adenosine.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board, SOLACI.org

Original Title: Comparison of Intracoronary Epinephrine and Adenosine for No-Reflow in Normotensive Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (COAR Trial).

Reference: Kamran Ahmed Khan, et al Circulation Volume 15, Issue 2, February 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...