Is Coronary Revascularization Useful in Renal Transplant Candidates?

Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death in patients with functioning renal transplant, reaching 30%, with the highest rate at peri transplant stage. At the same time, the incidence of acute myocardial infraction (AMI) after renal transplant ranges from 5% to 11%. This is why asymptomatic candidates are routinely screened for CAD before transplant. 

¿Es útil la revascularización coronaria en pacientes candidatos a trasplante renal?

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of coronary revascularization vs optimal medical treatment before transplant. 

Primary end point was all cause mortality. 

8 studies were looked at, including 945 patients in total. 35.9% were women, mean age 56. Five studies reported total mortality. 

There were no significant differences (RR 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63-2.12] in primary end point. Four studies reported cardiovascular mortality, also with no significant differences. (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.29–1.89]). 

Read also: Ticagrelor Monotherapy after 3 Months: Is the Current Strategy Worth Changing?

Finally , 6 studies reported major cardiovascular events with the same result (RR,0.78 [95% CI, 0.30–2.07]).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed coronary revascularization is not superior to optimal medical treatment when it comes to reducing total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events in renal transplant candidates

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org

Original Title: Coronary Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Renal Transplant Candidates With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reference: Muhammad U. Siddiqui, J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11:e023548.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...