IVUS in Femoropopliteal PCI: Should We Start Using It?

For approximately two decades now, PCI has been the treatment of choice in femoropopliteal territory, and even though technological developments and increasing operator experience have indeed improved outcomes, IVUS (which has showed great benefits in PCI, even reducing left main mortality) is hardly used in this territory. 

IVUS en la ATP femoropoplítea: ¿deberíamos comenzar a utilizarlo?

This was a prospective randomized controlled study including 150 patients: 74 angiography guided and 76 IVUS guided

Primary end point was freedom from binary stenosis guided by IVUS at 12 months (stenosis ≥50% or systolic peak velocity ≥2.4). Secondary end point was TLR because of symptoms, periprocedural complications and MAE (amputation within 30 days, death, MI and stroke) within 12 months after index procedure. 

There were no differences between the populations as regards clinical characteristics and risk factors, neither were there differences in angiographic characteristics or strategy (POBA, BARE stents, DES or drug eluting balloons). Diameters and length were also similar, except for the use of drug eluting balloons, which were longer in the IVUS group. 

At 12 month follow up, the primary end point resulted in favor of the IVUS group (72.4% vs 55.4%; P= 0.008). There were no differences in freedom from TLR within 12 months after index procedure (84.2% and 82.4%) or in MAE. 

Read also: Wire Jailing at Side Branch to Prevent Occlusion After Main Vessel Stenting: Should It Be the Standard of Care?

Neither were there differences between populations as regards binary restenosis when compared against POBA, BARE stents or DES, but there were differences when using drug eluting balloons in favor of the IVUS group (9.1% vs. 37.5% P= 0.004).

IVUS showed longer lesions and larger vessel diameter compared against angiography guided PCI (diameter 5.60 mm vs. 5.10 mm P<0.001 and length 140 mm vs. 120 mm P=0.01), in addition to nearly 80% of change in strategy.

Conclusion

The use of IVUS showed significant reduction of restenosis rate after endovascular intervention. This is the first study to show IVUS improves evolution in femoropopliteal interventions. This benefit might be related to the use of drug eluting balloons. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board, SOLACI.org.

Original Title: The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound on Femoropopliteal Artery Endovascular Interventions A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reference: Richard B. Allan, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:536–546. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....