ACC 2022 | ADAPT-TAVR: Endoxaban Is Not Superior to DAPT After TAVR

DAPT-TAVR is a randomized trial that tested endoxaban in patients with no indication for anticoagulation who underwent successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

ACC 2022 | ADAPT-TAVR: Endoxaban No Better Than DAPT After TAVI

This study included 229 patients whose mean age was 80 years; 42% of them were male. Patients were randomized to either endoxaban 60 mg or 30 mg every 24 h or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin plus clopidogrel).

Low dosage was used in 61.3% of patients because they met one of the following criteria: moderate to severe function impairment, low weight, or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors. After 6 months, they were tested by means of 4-dimensional angioTAC, neurological and cognitive assessment, and brain MRI.

Populations were similar, with no difference in characteristics between groups, and 90% received a balloon-expandable valve. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 3.3%.

After 6 months of follow-up, endoxaban failed to show a significant difference in fewer leafleat thrombosis in the intent-to-treat arm, but there was a difference in patients with high DOAC compliance (9.1% vs. 19.1%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.99).

Read also: ACC 2022 | BENTRACIMAB.

There were no differences in the secondary endpoints, which included leaflet mobility reduction ≥3; presence, number and volume of new brain lesions in the MRI; and neurological changes.

Leaflet hypoattenuation was not linked to new brain lesions, neurological disorders, or cognitive disfunction.

Furthermore, there were no differences in the safety endpoints, which included death, stroke, systemic thromboembolism, or bleeding vs. DAPT (11.7% vs. 12.7%; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.44-1.96).

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org .


Suscríbase a nuestro newsletter semanal

Reciba resúmenes con los últimos artículos científicos

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...