Same Day Discharge in NSTE-ACS: Is It Possible?

At present, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most common coronary revascularization strategy. One of its benefits is that patients can be safely discharged when procedures are programed, which helps decompress hospital capacity. 

¿Es posible el alta en el mismo día en los síndromes coronarios agudos sin elevación del segmento ST?

However, this strategy has not been validated for acute coronary syndromes; the evidence gathered for non-ST elevation ACS is far from robust, and therefore is not recommended by guidelines. 

It might be validated for low risk NSTE-ACS.

1385 NSTE-ACS cases treated with non-elective PCI were analyzed. 300 of these cases (19.6%) were discharged on the same day (SDD) and 1085 the following day (NDD).

Primary end point was readmission for any cause at 30 days. 

SDD patients were evaluated within 4-6 hours after procedure. If there were no complications, they were considered for discharge. 

Mean age was 62, there were no differences in hypertension, diabetes, COPD, dialysis, peripheral vascular disease or CABG. TIMI and GRACE scores were similar. 11% received IIb IIIa inhibitors.  

Read also: Thromboendarterectomy vs. Endovascular Therapy in Common Femoropopliteal Territory. Is Surgery Still the Gold Standard?

The SDD group showed lower increase of biomarkers and anemia. The use of the transradial approach was more frequent and anatomy was less complex in this group. 

The presence of unstable angina was higher in patients receiving SDD and NSTE-ACS in those receiving NDD.

There was no difference in stent use, treated artery, number of treated vessels or the use of IVUS.

In the SDD group discharge was seen more often during the morning (vs. the other cohort, more often discharged during the afternoon). 

Read also: High Risk of Bleeding after PCI: More Evidence for Short DAPT.

Hospital stay was 8 hours in the SDD cohort and 26 in the NDD group. 

Primary end point was more frequent in the NDD group (OR = 1.6 [1.01-2.57]; P < 0.01)

There were no differences in mortality and bleeding at 30 days and one year. 

Factors associated with SDD were: male sex, transradial approach, negative biomarkers and time of procedure. 

After propensity score matching, there were no differences in readmissions and mortality at 30 days. 

Conclusion

SDD after non-elective PCI for NSTE-ACS might be a valid alternative to NDD in selected low risk patients, seeing as it was comparable in mortality, bleeding and readmission rate. 

Original Title: Same day discharge following non-elective PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Reference: Essa Hariri, et al. Am Heart J 2022;246:125–135.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...