ESC 2022 | INVICTUS and PRE18FFIR

On the 3erd day of the European Cardiology Congress 2022 the INVICTUS study was presented, including 4565 patients with atrial fibrillation secondary to rheumatism driven CAD. The aim of this study was to compare the use of Rivaroxaban vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in this populations. Mean age was 50 and most patients were women. 

ESC 2022

Primary end point was stroke, systemic thromboembolism, AMI, or cardiovascular death. Study outcomes resulted in 560 primary end point events in the rivaroxaban group vs 446 events in the VKA group (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.10-1.41). On individual analysis, Rivaroxaban increased the risk of death by 23% and stroke by 37%. However, there were no differences in risk of bleeding between the groups. Drug discontinuation was more frequent in the Rivaroxaban group. 

Among rivaroxaban patients, when looking at RIN valued before study kickoff, within therapeutic range, it was 33%, and at follow-up, it reached 64% in 4 years. 

The use of vitamin K antagonists should be the standard treatment for rheumatic atrial fibrillation. We need further study to properly assess the different therapies for this special population. 

On the other hand, a multicenter prospective study was presented, the PRE18FFIR, which used sodium fluoride positron emission tomography scan (PET) to identify vulnerable plaque without the need for intravascular ultrasound imaging, predicting the risk of future cardiovascular events. 704 AMI and multivessel patients were included. They all received PET and coronary CT angiography and were followed up to 2 years. 

Read also: ESC 2022 | SECURE Trial.

There were no differences between patients with active coronary microcalcification and those who did not present any. However, when looking at cardiovascular death or AMI, events rate was higher among patients with positive PET imaging for CMA. 

This study shows an important role for PET in the assessment of cardiovascular risk. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...