Stent Thrombosis: Clinical Characteristics and Event Predictors in a Contemporary Cohort

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a serious complication of coronary PCI. However, its incidence across registries is low. It has been classified according to onset into acute (less than 24 hrs.), subacute (between 24 and 30 days), late (between 30 and 365 days) and very late (later than 365 days).  The estimated incidence of ST is 1% within the first year. The most common clinical presentation of ST is through ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ST-ACS).

Trombosis del stent

The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, characteristics and hospital outcomes of patients undergoing coronary PCI for ST compared against patients without ST undergoing PCI. 

It was a retrospective study of ACS patients from England and Wales from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) percutaneous coronary intervention registry, who were stratified into ST and non-ST. Primary end points were in-hospital major cardio and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), all-cause mortality and BARC 3-5 bleeding.

Of a total 571,949 procedures, 61.5% were for SCA and 2.3% for ST (1.4% of the total cohort); 52.6% were early ST, 12% late ST and 35.4% very late ST. 

Patients with ST treatment indication were generally younger (64.6 – 64.9 vs 65.4 years), mostly men (81.2% vs 73%) and the most frequent presentation was ST-ACS (74.7% vs 40%). 

ST intervention was associated to more use of mechanical ventilation (6% vs 3.1%) or circulatory support (6.1% vs 2.4%). The use of IVUS/OCT was more frequent in this clinical scenario vs. patients without ST (30.5% vs 8.4%). As regards device, patients with ST less frequently received drug eluting stents (66.9% vs 84.6%), mainly at the expense of a higher use of drug coated balloons (1.8% vs 0.2%). There was also more frequent use of more potent antiaggregants (Prasugrel and Ticagrelor).

Read also: EMINENT Trial | Stent Eluvia vs BMS in Femoropopliteal Territory.

In ST patients undergoing PCI, there were more MACCE (6.4% vs 3.5%), especially among the early ST patients (8.1%). This difference was noted at the expense of higher all-cause mortality (5.7% vs 3.0%). When looking at time ranges, the rate of PCI for ST declined, comparing years 2014-2015 against 2019-2020. 

After adjusting for baseline differences, the difference in MACCE was higher in ST patients (OR 1.22, IC 95% 1.05vs1.41) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.21, IC 95% 1.07-1.36). At multivariable analysis, the strongest predictors were ST ACS (OR: 3.07), renal failure (OR: 3.49) and ventricular function deterioration (OR:3.98). 

Conclusions

This important cohort of patients spanning 7 years is one of the largest on stent thrombosis, with 1.4% incidence of all PCI procedures, a rate that has been falling lately. In addition, intravascular imaging examinations such as IVUS/OCT were underused as complementary techniques to look into the cause of ST.  

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Temporal patterns, characteristics, and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis.

Reference: Mohamed, Mohamed O et al. “Temporal patterns, characteristics, and predictors of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for stent thrombosis.” EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology vol. 18,9 (2022): 729-739. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00049.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...