Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Are There Differences Between Men and Women?

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is one of the causes of acute coronary syndrome, with a prevalence between 1 and 4%, that might reach up to 35% in women <50 years old, according to recent studies.

Disección coronaria espontánea: ¿Hay diferencias entre hombres y mujeres?

As dissections are more frequent in women, research focuses on this population. Small retrospective studies have shown different triggers and predisposing causes in men compared with women. These differences could result in divergent in-hospital and long-term results.

The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes for men with spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and to compare them with those for women.

Comparisons were made in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, angiography findings, and cardiovascular results after 3 years in men and women participating in the Canadian Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Cohort Study. Additionally, major adverse cardiac events (MACE)—a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke or transient ischemic attack, hospitalization due to heart failure, and revascularization—were evaluated.

Read also: EMINENT Trial | Stent Eluvia vs BMS in Femoropopliteal Territory.

A total of 1173 patients were analyzed: 10.5% were men and 89.5% were women. When comparing both genders, males were younger (p = 0.01), had lower rates of prior AMI (p = 0.005), and significantly lower rates of depression, tinnitus, or migraine. When screening for fibromuscular dysplasia, diagnostic rates were lower for men than for women.

In terms of emotional triggers, men reported less emotional stress than women, but more physical stress. Clinical presentation was similar between genders. The most affected coronary artery was the anterior descending artery in both groups. However, men had greater affectation of the circumflex artery. Conservative treatment was the most used alternative, with no difference between genders, and, in patients who underwent angioplasty, success and complication rates were similar between them.

During follow-up, men had less precordial pain than women. At 3 years, men had a lower rate of ER visits and hospitalizations due to precordial pain. No significant differences were found in AMI recurrence, coronary dissection recurrence, and MACE.

Conclusion

While men account for a smaller proportion of cases of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (approximately 10%), they are younger and have more physical triggers. However, they have less diagnosis of fibromuscular dysplasia, depression, and emotional triggers. Angiographic findings and in-hospital outcomes were similar between men and women, and during follow-up men had less recurrence of precordial pain. There were no significant differences in MACE between men and women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Differences in Demographics and Outcomes Between Men and Women With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Reference: Cameron McAlister, MBCHB et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:2052–2061.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...