Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Stages of Heart Failure and Prognostic Implications after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

We are already familiar with the strong impact of secondary mitral valve regurgitation (SMR) in survival and quality of life.

Insuficiencia mitral secundaria: Clasificación según daño cardiaco y su implicancia pronóstica luego de la reparación de la válvula mitral borde a borde

 Most of these patients present heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Stages of heart failure based on extra-mitral cardiac involvement has been shown relevant. There is also extensive research on aortic valve disease and data on medically treated HFrEF-SMR patients divided into stages. 

Patients with left ventricular dilation or left atrial enlargement have shown around 85% survival rate at 3 years, while this reduces to 75% with tricuspid regurgitation or pulmonary hypertension. Finally, patients with right ventricular dysfunction present the worse prognosis, with 60% survival rate at 3 years, approximately.  

The aim of this retrospective study was to apply the HR stages above mentioned to patients undergoing transcatheter Edge-to-edge (M-TEER), and assess the prognostic implications of these classification in terms of survival and symptoms. 

Primary end point was all cause mortality, and symptoms expressed as functional class according to NYHA at 2 years. Patients were classified into 4 stages: stage 1 (LV end diastolic volume ≥ 159 ml or EF < 50%), stage 2 (history of atrial fibrillation or indexed left atrial volume > 34 ml/m2), stage 3 (tricuspid regurgitation ≥ 3 and/or PSAP >65 mmHg), stage 4 (biventricular dysfunction.  

Read also: Is There Any Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Transient and Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in ACS Patients after Invasive Treatment?

Of 1354 patients set to be analyzed, only 849 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 72 and there were more men, mostly in stage 2 (46% of patients), followed by stage IV (29%), stage III (15%) and stage I (10%).

Survival rate at 2 years was significantly different between stages (stage I: 78.1%, stage II: 71.9%, stage III: 62.9%, stage IV: 48.9%; P< 0.01). On the other hand, HR symptoms tended to increase as stages increased, though differences were not statistically significant. 

Finally, at multivariable analysis, kidney function, diabetes mellitus, age, NYHA functional class IV, post M-TEER MR ≥3+, and stage increase resulted predictors of all-cause mortality at 2 years.

Conclusion 

M-TEER patients classified into HFrEF-SMR stages according to extra-mitral cardiac involvement should be taken into account by the heart team for decision making on therapeutic strategy. Stage classification is easy to implement and is associated to significant differences in symptoms and survival after M-TEER. In addition, this could be useful to identify patients that will benefit from early intervention.   

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Staging Heart Failure Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Reference: Lukas Stolz, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...