MitraScore: What Does the Final Result of Edge-to-Edge Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation Provide?

Edge-to-edge treatment has proven to be a safe and effective technique in follow-up, decreasing mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure when a good result is achieved.

MitraScore: ¿qué nos aporta en el resultado final para el tratamiento borde a borde de la insuficiencia mitral

The MitraScore was developed to assess the outcome at the end of the procedure. In that sense, results <3 represent mild mitral regurgitation, which would be related to lower mortality, although this has not yet been validated.

Researchers conducted a prospective analysis of the MITRA-PRO Registry, including 1491 patients with primary, secondary, or mixed severe mitral regurgitation. Out of all patients who underwent edge-to-edge treatment, 1059 had a MitraScore ≤3 (71%) and 432 ≥4.

The devices used were MITRACLIP XT, NT, NTR, and XTR.

The groups were similar: mean age was 78 years; 43% of subjects were women; EUROScore = 22; 86% of patients had hypertension, 28% had diabetes, 60% had coronary artery disease, 18% had undergone myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), 7% had undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 70% experienced atrial fibrillation, 22% had a permanent pacemaker, 17% had an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (AICD), and 12% had received cardiac resynchronization therapy. More than 50% had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation and their ejection fraction was 44%.

The cause of mitral regurgitation was secondary in 56% of the patients, degenerative in 28%, and mixed in the rest of the subjects studied.

Read also: Survival in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation According to Clinical and Echocardiographic Variables (Clusters).

There were no differences in terms of pharmacological treatment received.

In-hospital mortality (1.6% vs.1.9%) and MACCE were also similar.

At the one-year follow-up, mortality was lower in patients with MitraScore 3 (14.6% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio [HR]): 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.13; p < 0.001), and so were the composite of death and rehospitalizations (31.5% vs. 40.8%; HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.35-2.21 p<0.0001), and rehospitalizations and need for reintervention.

Conclusion

The presence of intra-procedural residual mitral regurgitation analyzed by MitraScore after edge-to-edge therapy predicts mortality and rehospitalization at one year. Thus, the MitraScore improves the assessment of residual mitral regurgitation during edge-to-edge therapy and may improve patient survival.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Intraprocedural Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Prospective German Multicenter Registry (MITRA-PRO).

Reference: Peter Boekstegers, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:574–585.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...