MitraScore: What Does the Final Result of Edge-to-Edge Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation Provide?

Edge-to-edge treatment has proven to be a safe and effective technique in follow-up, decreasing mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure when a good result is achieved.

MitraScore: ¿qué nos aporta en el resultado final para el tratamiento borde a borde de la insuficiencia mitral

The MitraScore was developed to assess the outcome at the end of the procedure. In that sense, results <3 represent mild mitral regurgitation, which would be related to lower mortality, although this has not yet been validated.

Researchers conducted a prospective analysis of the MITRA-PRO Registry, including 1491 patients with primary, secondary, or mixed severe mitral regurgitation. Out of all patients who underwent edge-to-edge treatment, 1059 had a MitraScore ≤3 (71%) and 432 ≥4.

The devices used were MITRACLIP XT, NT, NTR, and XTR.

The groups were similar: mean age was 78 years; 43% of subjects were women; EUROScore = 22; 86% of patients had hypertension, 28% had diabetes, 60% had coronary artery disease, 18% had undergone myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), 7% had undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 70% experienced atrial fibrillation, 22% had a permanent pacemaker, 17% had an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (AICD), and 12% had received cardiac resynchronization therapy. More than 50% had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation and their ejection fraction was 44%.

The cause of mitral regurgitation was secondary in 56% of the patients, degenerative in 28%, and mixed in the rest of the subjects studied.

Read also: Survival in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation According to Clinical and Echocardiographic Variables (Clusters).

There were no differences in terms of pharmacological treatment received.

In-hospital mortality (1.6% vs.1.9%) and MACCE were also similar.

At the one-year follow-up, mortality was lower in patients with MitraScore 3 (14.6% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio [HR]): 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.13; p < 0.001), and so were the composite of death and rehospitalizations (31.5% vs. 40.8%; HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.35-2.21 p<0.0001), and rehospitalizations and need for reintervention.

Conclusion

The presence of intra-procedural residual mitral regurgitation analyzed by MitraScore after edge-to-edge therapy predicts mortality and rehospitalization at one year. Thus, the MitraScore improves the assessment of residual mitral regurgitation during edge-to-edge therapy and may improve patient survival.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Intraprocedural Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Prospective German Multicenter Registry (MITRA-PRO).

Reference: Peter Boekstegers, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:574–585.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

ACVC 2026 | BOX Substudy: Mean Arterial Pressure Targets in Cardiogenic Shock After OHCA

Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock following ischemic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA-AMICS) remains an unresolved issue, particularly regarding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...