MitraScore: What Does the Final Result of Edge-to-Edge Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation Provide?

Edge-to-edge treatment has proven to be a safe and effective technique in follow-up, decreasing mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure when a good result is achieved.

MitraScore: ¿qué nos aporta en el resultado final para el tratamiento borde a borde de la insuficiencia mitral

The MitraScore was developed to assess the outcome at the end of the procedure. In that sense, results <3 represent mild mitral regurgitation, which would be related to lower mortality, although this has not yet been validated.

Researchers conducted a prospective analysis of the MITRA-PRO Registry, including 1491 patients with primary, secondary, or mixed severe mitral regurgitation. Out of all patients who underwent edge-to-edge treatment, 1059 had a MitraScore ≤3 (71%) and 432 ≥4.

The devices used were MITRACLIP XT, NT, NTR, and XTR.

The groups were similar: mean age was 78 years; 43% of subjects were women; EUROScore = 22; 86% of patients had hypertension, 28% had diabetes, 60% had coronary artery disease, 18% had undergone myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), 7% had undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 70% experienced atrial fibrillation, 22% had a permanent pacemaker, 17% had an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (AICD), and 12% had received cardiac resynchronization therapy. More than 50% had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation and their ejection fraction was 44%.

The cause of mitral regurgitation was secondary in 56% of the patients, degenerative in 28%, and mixed in the rest of the subjects studied.

Read also: Survival in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation According to Clinical and Echocardiographic Variables (Clusters).

There were no differences in terms of pharmacological treatment received.

In-hospital mortality (1.6% vs.1.9%) and MACCE were also similar.

At the one-year follow-up, mortality was lower in patients with MitraScore 3 (14.6% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio [HR]): 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.13; p < 0.001), and so were the composite of death and rehospitalizations (31.5% vs. 40.8%; HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.35-2.21 p<0.0001), and rehospitalizations and need for reintervention.

Conclusion

The presence of intra-procedural residual mitral regurgitation analyzed by MitraScore after edge-to-edge therapy predicts mortality and rehospitalization at one year. Thus, the MitraScore improves the assessment of residual mitral regurgitation during edge-to-edge therapy and may improve patient survival.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Intraprocedural Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Prospective German Multicenter Registry (MITRA-PRO).

Reference: Peter Boekstegers, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:574–585.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve...

After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who experience a major bleeding event represents a complex clinical scenario in which percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)...

New Balloon-Expandable Aortic Valve: 30-Day Outcomes in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus

As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continues to expand toward younger patients with longer life expectancy, factors such as valve hemodynamic performance, durability, and...

TAVI in small aortic annulus: self-expanding or balloon-expandable valve in the long term?

Patients with a small aortic annulus (a predominantly female population with a higher risk of prosthesis–patient mismatch) represent a particularly challenging subgroup within TAVI....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve...

After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who experience a major bleeding event represents a complex clinical scenario in which percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)...