MitraScore: What Does the Final Result of Edge-to-Edge Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation Provide?

Edge-to-edge treatment has proven to be a safe and effective technique in follow-up, decreasing mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure when a good result is achieved.

MitraScore: ¿qué nos aporta en el resultado final para el tratamiento borde a borde de la insuficiencia mitral

The MitraScore was developed to assess the outcome at the end of the procedure. In that sense, results <3 represent mild mitral regurgitation, which would be related to lower mortality, although this has not yet been validated.

Researchers conducted a prospective analysis of the MITRA-PRO Registry, including 1491 patients with primary, secondary, or mixed severe mitral regurgitation. Out of all patients who underwent edge-to-edge treatment, 1059 had a MitraScore ≤3 (71%) and 432 ≥4.

The devices used were MITRACLIP XT, NT, NTR, and XTR.

The groups were similar: mean age was 78 years; 43% of subjects were women; EUROScore = 22; 86% of patients had hypertension, 28% had diabetes, 60% had coronary artery disease, 18% had undergone myocardial revascularization surgery (MRS), 7% had undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), 70% experienced atrial fibrillation, 22% had a permanent pacemaker, 17% had an Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (AICD), and 12% had received cardiac resynchronization therapy. More than 50% had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation and their ejection fraction was 44%.

The cause of mitral regurgitation was secondary in 56% of the patients, degenerative in 28%, and mixed in the rest of the subjects studied.

Read also: Survival in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation According to Clinical and Echocardiographic Variables (Clusters).

There were no differences in terms of pharmacological treatment received.

In-hospital mortality (1.6% vs.1.9%) and MACCE were also similar.

At the one-year follow-up, mortality was lower in patients with MitraScore 3 (14.6% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio [HR]): 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.13; p < 0.001), and so were the composite of death and rehospitalizations (31.5% vs. 40.8%; HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.35-2.21 p<0.0001), and rehospitalizations and need for reintervention.

Conclusion

The presence of intra-procedural residual mitral regurgitation analyzed by MitraScore after edge-to-edge therapy predicts mortality and rehospitalization at one year. Thus, the MitraScore improves the assessment of residual mitral regurgitation during edge-to-edge therapy and may improve patient survival.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Intraprocedural Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Prospective German Multicenter Registry (MITRA-PRO).

Reference: Peter Boekstegers, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:574–585.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...

Experience with the intra-annular self-expanding Navitor valve: data from the STS/ACC TVT registry

The expansion of TAVI, with the introduction of new-generation devices, has prioritized not only periprocedural safety, but also the preservation of coronary access, more...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...

Experience with the intra-annular self-expanding Navitor valve: data from the STS/ACC TVT registry

The expansion of TAVI, with the introduction of new-generation devices, has prioritized not only periprocedural safety, but also the preservation of coronary access, more...