EuroPCR 2023 | EBC Two – Provisional Stenting vs Culotte in Bifurcations

MD Sandeep Arunothayaraj presented the 5-year followup of EBC Two (which had not previously shown significant differences in clinical outcomes at 12 months) in patients randomized to provisional stenting vs. systematic culotte in bifurcations that were not left main. 

 

The study followed up 200 patients with true bifurcations, side branch ≥2.5mm and lesion length ≥5mm, treated with second generation drug eluting stents. Primary end point was the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization. 

Mean age was 63 and the main localization was the anterior descending and first diagonal branch (77.7%). Mean branch diameter was 2.7±0.3mm, with lesion length 10.3±7.2mm at 5 years. 

Primary end point happened in 18.4% of cases treated with provisional stenting and 23.7% of patients treated with systematic culotte (HR 0.75, CI 95% 0.41-1.38). There were no significant differences.

When looking at bifurcation related adverse cardiovascular events (BACE – acute vessel occlusion, stent thrombosis, AMI type 4 or new revascularization) there were no significant differences (5.8% vs 7.2%, HR 0.80, CI 95% 0.27-2.39; P=0.69).

Read also: Cobertura EuroPCR 2023.

Routine use of culotte did not improve MACE at 5 years, vs. provisional stenting (only 16% of patients using this strategy required side branch stenting).

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Reference: Presented by Sandeep Arunothayaraj in Late Breaking Trials Sessions, EuroPCR 2023, May 16, 2023, París, France.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...