5 Year Evolution of PCI vs CABG in Large Randomized Studies on Acute and Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Left main lesions in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represent a major risk and, at present, the best revascularization strategy is a matter of debate. Though many studies and registries have excluded this group of patients, there is data on the pros and cons of both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiac artery bypass graft (CABG). 

Evolución a 5 años de la angioplastia vs cirugía en los grandes estudios sobre síndromes agudos y crónicos

This analysis looked at 4 randomized studies comparing PCI with drug eluting stents (DES) vs. CABG (SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, NOBLE and EXCEL) including a total of 1,466 patients (33.4%) with SCA and 2,927 without SCA (NSCA).

Primary end point was all cause mortality at 5 years. Mean age was 65 and most patients were men. There were no significant differences between the groups, except for a higher prevalence of diabetes, prior MI, ejection fraction <50 and higher SYNTAX score, among SCA patients (26.4 vs. 25.2; p < 0.001).

Time from randomization to procedure was shorter in patients undergoing PCI.

At 30 days, there was higher cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in SCA patients vs. NACS (1.8 vs. 0.5 p<0.001 AND 1.9 vs. 0.5 p<0.001 respectively).

MI rate was higher in ACS patients both at one and five year followup (2.3% vs. 1.0%; HR 2.73, 95% CI ;1.63-4.58; p < 0.001 and 5.7% vs. 3.8%; HR 1.70, 95%CI: 1.25-2.31; p < 0.001, respectively).

Read also: Minimal Stent Area: New IVUS Parameter?

MI rate was higher in ACS patients both at one and five year followup (2.3% vs. 1.0%; HR 2.73, 95% CI ;1.63-4.58; p < 0.001 and 5.7% vs. 3.8%; HR 1.70, 95%CI: 1.25-2.31; p < 0.001, respectively).

Primary end point resulted similar with PCI for both ACS and NACS patients (10.9% vs 11.5% HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68-1.27 and 11.3%vs 9.6% HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.95-1.50 respectively). There was a lower rate of stroke in the PCI group, but this group also showed higher need for repeat revascularization or MI vs. CABG patients. 

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing left main revascularization with low to intermediate coronary anatomical complexity, patients presenting ACS had a higher rate of early mortality. However, 5-year mortality was similar between PCI and CABG. In the short term, PCI had a relative advantage over CABG in terms of stroke. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes. A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials

Reference: Prakriti Gaba, et al. JAMA Cardiol. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...