No Reflow after Primary PCI in STEMI: An Angiographic Analysis of the TOTAL Study

In the early days of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), no reflow phenomenon was known as an indicator of the worst possible outcomes in terms of left ventricular remodeling, infarct size, ejection fraction and mortality, at long term. 

Fenómeno de no reflow luego de ATC primaria en IAMCEST

The TOTAL study (Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy with PCI Versus PCI Alone in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary PCI), comparing manual thrombus aspiration vs. primary PCI alone, did no show significant differences as regards cardiovascular death, repeat MI, cardiogenic shock or NYHA class IV cardiac failure. However, there was increased risk of stroke in the manual thrombectomy group. 

The aim of this post hoc analysis from the multicenter, randomized TOTAL study, was to assess the effect of manual thrombectomy on no reflow outcomes across different subgroups. The study also looked at the link between no reflow and major cardiovascular events at one year, and sought to determine the clinical predictors of no reflow. 

Primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular death, repeat MI, cardiogenic shock and NYHA class IV cardiac failure. Secondary end point included all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for any cause, and stent thrombosis. 

Read also: Mitral Valve Edge to Edge Repair for Papillary Muscle Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

The analysis included 1800 patients, 10.9% presenting no reflow. Patients in this group were older (64,4 vs 60,8 p <0,01), and mostly men. They more often presented a higher class of Killip Kimball, lower TIMI flow before PCI and less use of direct stenting. 

Patients randomized to manual thrombectomy presented 10,7% no reflow rate, while the PCI group presented 11,1% rate (odds ratio [OR] 0,95, CI 95%: 0,71-1,28; p = 0,76). Patients undergoing direct stenting, in the thrombectomy group, showed a lower incidence of no reflow vs. the PCI group (5,1% vs 9,7%, OR 0,50, CI 95%: 0,26-0,96).

Read also: Secondary Prevention with P2Y12 Inhibitors: How Consolidated Is This Long Term Alternative vs. Aspirin?

At one year, patients experiencing no reflow had a 70% increased relative risk of primary end point (15,8% vs 6,3%, HR 1,70, CI 95%: 1,13-2,56; p = 0,01). Also, no reflow was associated with higher risk of cardiogenic shock (8,2% vs 1,7%, HR 2,20, CI 95%: 1,14-4,24, p = 0,02). No flow predictors were identified as: age (OR 1,25, CI 95%: 1,09-1,42; p = 0,001), TIMI flow 3 prior PCI (OR 0,33, CI 95%: 0,19-0,56; p < 0,0001) and direct stenting (OR 0,66, CI 95%: 0,45-0,95, p = 0,03).

Conclusion

This analysis has shown that manual thrombectomy did not reduce no reflow in all patients, but when combined with direct stenting there might be synergy. No reflow is associated with increased adverse clinical events. More studies are required to better assess the link between no reflow and direct stenting. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: No-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an angiographic core laboratory analysis of the TOTAL Trial.

Reference: Marc-André d’Entremont  MD, MPH et al EuroIntervention 2023;19.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...