Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Impella in High Risk Coronary Angioplasty before TAVR

The population is aging, which is closely related with the presence of aortic stenosis. This condition, as we know, is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) approximately in 50% of cases. In high risk surgical patients, this calls for procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).  

Impella

PCI with ventricular assistance devices has surged as a valid option in this scenario; however, we should note that information on this treatment strategy is limited. 

This study recruited 15 patients with severe CAD and severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk, but the Impella failed to cross the aortic valve in 1 patient, who was excluded despite having received balloon aortic valvuloplasty.   

Mean patient age was 88, and 6 were women. Mortality STS score was 8.3%, and SYNTAX was 16. Also, 12 patients presented hypertension and 3 had diabetes. 

Cardiac parameters showed ejection fraction was 51%, aortic valve area (AVAO) 0.85 cm², and mean gradient 40 mmHg. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 19 mmHg, while median pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 17 mmHg. Five patients experienced cardiac failure with ventricular function deterioration. 

Read also: Low vs High Dose Drug Coated Balloons in Femoropopliteal Territory.

Left main PCI was performed in 6 patients, rotational atherectomy in 10, and 2 received two-vessel PCI. 

The Impella was advanced via the femoral artery in all patients, which required prior valvuloplasty in two cases. We should point out there were no vascular complications and that the Impella access site was closed with 2 Proglide devices, and the PCI access site was closed with 1 Proglide device. 

As regards complications, there were no significant adverse events after PCI. 

RRead also: Coronary Calcification: More Frequent Use of Coronary Lithotripsy as a Recommendation.

Time between Impella placement and TAVR was 25 days, on average, ranging between 10 and 35 days. 

As regards TAVR, all patients received a Sapien valve successfully, with no serious complications in the 30 days after intervention. 

Conclusion

In sum, the outcomes of this series of cases carried out in a single center indicate that high risk Impella assisted PCI is feasible and safe as preparation for TAVR in selected patients with severe aortic stenosis. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Feasibility and Safety of Impella-Assisted High-Risk PCI Before TAVR in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis. 

Reference: Ilhwan Yeo, el al. JSCAIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101061.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...