Use of IVL in Calcified Coronary Lesions in a Real World Population

The presence of calcification in coronary arteries (CAC) remains a challenge for the percutaneous treatment of these lesions. Several studies have established the link between CAC and poor long term results.  Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has surged as a tool to induce calcified plaque fracture.  Even though studies on this strategy are not randomized, they have shown high success rates for this device with good clinical and angiographic results. 

Dietas bajas en carbohidratos y progresión de la calcificación coronaria

The aim of this prospective, multicenter study was to assess the safety and efficacy of IVL in calcified lesions in a real world cohort of consecutive patients. 

The efficacy primary outcome was defined as procedural success, that is, successful PCI with residual stenosis <20%, with no in-hospital complications (cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction or need for target vessel revascularization (TVR)). The safety secondary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, acute MI, or TVR.

It included 426 patients (456 lesions), mean age 73, with a higher prevalence of men. The most common clinical presentation was acute coronary syndrome (ASC) in 63% of cases. Most patients presented good ventricular function (EF >50%), and the transradial approach was the most used (76%). The most affected coronary artery was the anterior descending (44%), followed by the right coronary (31%), the circumflex (12%) and the left main (11%).

Read also: Lithotripsy in the Left Main Coronary Artery.

As regards the safety end point, it was reached in 66% of patients, with similar rates between ACS patients (65%) and those with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (68%). In addition, there were no significant differences in angiographic success after IVL between these two groups of patients. As regards the safety end point, the 30-day MACE rate resulted 3%: 1% in CCS patients and 5% ACS patients (p=0.073).

Conclusion

The use of IVL was shown feasible and safe in a real world population, facilitating the effective stenting of severe calcified lesions. Even though ACS patients showed angiographically similar rates, they showed a trend towards higher 30-day MACE vs. CCS patients. More long term studies are required to assess the clinical benefits associate to this therapeutic tool. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Arteries The REPLICA-EPIC18 Study.

Reference: Oriol Rodriguez-Leor, MD, PHD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2024.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...