Reinterventions in TAVR with Self-Expanding Valves

TAVR treatment of severe aortic stenosis is becoming more and more common, showing comparable evolution, or even superior in some studies when using the femoral approach, vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

stent

One of the current challenges is TAVR durability vs. SAVR. Even though 9 or 10 years has been deemed acceptable by current standards, we should not overlook the fact that there is a group of patients that will require reintervention, a scenario that we have not yet looked at in depth, let alone compared against surgery, which most likely will eventually be addressed. 

This was a retrospective analysis of the CoreValve US Pivotal Extreme-Risk, High-Risk and SURTAVI trials, including 7,757 patients: 5,925 undergoing TAVR (4,478 CoreValve and 1,447 Evolute R/PRO) and 1,832 SVAR.

99 of these patients (1.3%) required reintervention; 80 were treated with TAVR (69 CoreValve and 11 Evolut R/PRO).

Read also: 12-Month Evolution of Edge-to-Edge Repair with PASCAL.

At 5 year followup, 99 patients (1.3%) needed reinterventions, most frequently TAVR patients (2.2% vs. 1.5%; P=0.017) vs SVAR. Reinterventions were more common during the first year (<1 year; adjusted subdistribution HR: 3.50; CI 95%: 1.53-8.02), but there were no differences between years 1 and 5 (adjusted subdistribution HR: 1.05; CI 95%: 0.48-2.28). The main cause behind reintervention in TAVR patients were regurgitations and in SAVR patients, endocarditis. 

At 5 years, Evolut R/PRO presented a lower reintervention rate vs. CoreValve (0.9% vs. 1.6%; P=0.006), but there were no differences with SVAR (0.9% vs. 1.5%; P=0.41).

Conclusion

There was a lower reintervention rate for CoreValve/Evolut R/PRO and SVAR. Reinterventions were more frequent within the first year in TAVR patients and after the first year in SAVR patients. There were more reinterventions with first generation TAVR, CoreValve, and they were solved percutaneously. Reinterventions were more frequent with CoreValve than Evolut or SVAR.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Reinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis. 

Reference: Kendra J. Grubb, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2024;17:1007–1016.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Is upper-limb aerobic training an effective alternative to lower-limb exercise in peripheral artery disease?

Peripheral artery disease is associated with impaired functional capacity, reduced walking distance, and poorer quality of life, and structured exercise is a class I...