Reinterventions in TAVR with Self-Expanding Valves

TAVR treatment of severe aortic stenosis is becoming more and more common, showing comparable evolution, or even superior in some studies when using the femoral approach, vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

stent

One of the current challenges is TAVR durability vs. SAVR. Even though 9 or 10 years has been deemed acceptable by current standards, we should not overlook the fact that there is a group of patients that will require reintervention, a scenario that we have not yet looked at in depth, let alone compared against surgery, which most likely will eventually be addressed. 

This was a retrospective analysis of the CoreValve US Pivotal Extreme-Risk, High-Risk and SURTAVI trials, including 7,757 patients: 5,925 undergoing TAVR (4,478 CoreValve and 1,447 Evolute R/PRO) and 1,832 SVAR.

99 of these patients (1.3%) required reintervention; 80 were treated with TAVR (69 CoreValve and 11 Evolut R/PRO).

Read also: 12-Month Evolution of Edge-to-Edge Repair with PASCAL.

At 5 year followup, 99 patients (1.3%) needed reinterventions, most frequently TAVR patients (2.2% vs. 1.5%; P=0.017) vs SVAR. Reinterventions were more common during the first year (<1 year; adjusted subdistribution HR: 3.50; CI 95%: 1.53-8.02), but there were no differences between years 1 and 5 (adjusted subdistribution HR: 1.05; CI 95%: 0.48-2.28). The main cause behind reintervention in TAVR patients were regurgitations and in SAVR patients, endocarditis. 

At 5 years, Evolut R/PRO presented a lower reintervention rate vs. CoreValve (0.9% vs. 1.6%; P=0.006), but there were no differences with SVAR (0.9% vs. 1.5%; P=0.41).

Conclusion

There was a lower reintervention rate for CoreValve/Evolut R/PRO and SVAR. Reinterventions were more frequent within the first year in TAVR patients and after the first year in SAVR patients. There were more reinterventions with first generation TAVR, CoreValve, and they were solved percutaneously. Reinterventions were more frequent with CoreValve than Evolut or SVAR.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Reinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis. 

Reference: Kendra J. Grubb, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2024;17:1007–1016.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...