Evolution of Cardiac Damage in MitraClip

Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation affects the mitral apparatus and is related to severe insufficiency. At present, surgery is the treatment of choice for patients at low risk. 

La reparación de la válvula mitral con Mitraclip es segura en pacientes de alto riesgo

Oftentimes, this disease affects the elderly and/or those at high surgical risk, edge-to-edge repair being an excellent treatment alternative. 

We all know that the different stages of ventricular function deterioration have a negative impact on disease evolution, but there is little information on the impact of edge-to-edge evolution on each of these stages.

This analysis looked at 579 patients undergoing edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip to treat degenerative mitral valve regurgitation, classified according to cardiac damage. 

Stage 0 (S0) patients showed no cardiac damage. Stage 1 (S1) showed damage to the medial portion of the left ventricle or the left atrial (defined by ejection fraction ≤60%, end diastolic diameter >55 mm, end systolic diameter >35 mm, left atrial indexed volume ≥40 ml/m2 or atrial fibrillation). Stage 2 (S2) patients showed moderate damage to the left ventricle or the left atrial (defined by left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%, end diastolic diameter >60 mm, end systolic diameter >40 mm, left atrial indexed volume ≥60 ml/m2). And stage 3 (S3), showed right heart damage (defined as right tricuspid regurgitation or severe right ventricular function deterioration).

Read also: Prehospital Crushed vs. Integral Prasugrel in STEMI Patients with Large Myocardial Area at Risk

Patients in S0 or S1 were 84, S2 319 patients and S3 176 patients.

Mean age was 82 and 52% were women. Compared against patients in S0 or S1, patients in the more advanced stages presented more comorbidities, more hospitalization for cardiac failure and higher BNP levels.

By the end of procedure, S0 and S1 patients had residual mitral valve regurgitation ≤1+.

At 2 years, survival resulted higher in S0 and S1 patients vs. the other two stages (100% vs. 89.5% vs. 78.9% vs. 75.3%, respectively, p=0.013). All stages showed a reduction in hospitalization for cardiac failure vs. the prior year, but this reduction was higher for S= and S1 patients. 

Read also: Predictors of DCB Failure in De Novo Lesions.

There was an improvement in functional class in all groups, but the presence of functional class III-IV was more frequent in the more advanced stages. 

There was a reduction in mitral regurgitation maintained over time in all patients. 

After multivariable analysis, mortality predictors at 2 years were S2 and S3, female sex, functional class III-IV and residual mitral valve regurgitation >2+.

Conclusion

Advanced damage was associated with increased mortality risk in patients undergoing edge-to-edge repair for degenerative mitral valve regurgitation. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Cardiac Damage in Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Treated With Transcatheter Mitral Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Reference: Atsushi Sugiura, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17:e013794. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013794.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...