Do Leadless Pacemakers After TAVR Offer Benefits?

The need for pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains slightly higher than with surgery, especially after the implantation of self-expanding valves. While certain implantation techniques have reduced this need, the use of pacemakers increases costs, requires an additional procedure, and carries potential hospital complications, such as tricuspid regurgitation or endocarditis, as well as complications related to follow-up and generator replacement.

Leadless pacemakers could offer advantages over traditional ones, but that is yet to be demonstrated. Additionally, it is still unclear what happens once the battery runs out and one or more additional devices need to be implanted.

Researchers conducted an analysis on 165,272 patients who underwent TAVR between January 2017 and December 2020. Of these, 10,338 (7.2%) required permanent pacemaker implantation; 730 (7.06%) of them received leadless pacemakers (PPMI LDS), and the rest had transvenous pacemakers (PPMI T).

Patients who received PPMI LDS had more comorbidities, so the variables were adjusted to make the groups more uniform.

After adjustment, the mean age was 82 years, and 58% of subjects were men; 96% of the patients had hypertension, 50% had diabetes, 6% had had a heart attack, 84% experienced heart failure, 53% had atrial fibrillation, 58% had impaired renal function, 11% were on dialysis, and 13% had suffered a stroke.

Read also: Fluoroscopy-Guided vs. Ultrasound-Guided Transfemoral Access in Complex PCI: Results of the ULTRACOLOR Study.

The use of PPMI LDS increased 3.5 times over time.

The rate of hospital complications was lower with PPMI LDS (7.2% vs. 10.1%; P=0.014), especially concerning device-related complications (0.7% vs. 2.1%; P=0.015). However, the hospital stay was longer and entailed similar costs.

At two years of follow-up, there were no differences in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.32; P=0.15), heart failure hospitalizations (sdHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74-1.08; P=0.24) or endocarditis (sdHR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.44-2.17; P=0.95), but the rate for device-related complications was lower in those who received PPMI LDS (sdHR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.44-2.17; P=0.95).

Conclusion

The use of leadless pacemakers increased over time and was associated with a reduction in in-hospital complications. In the medium-term follow-up, they had a complication rate that was similar to that of transvenous pacemakers and there were no differences in mortality.

Original Title: Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Leadless vs Transvenous Pacemakers Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Hiroki A. Ueyama, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024;17:1779–179.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

Más artículos de este Autor

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

Left Bundle Branch Block after TAVR: What Is Its Impact?

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which can be either...

Multicenter Experience with 3D Intracardiac Echocardiography for Guiding Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Imaging techniques play a fundamental role in interventional cardiac procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears as an alternative to transesophageal...

Pathology of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Bioprostheses and Hypoattenuated Leaflet Thickening

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Despite the available long term followup data on of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), bioprosthesis durability continues under debate....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Artículos relacionados

Jornadas SOLACIspot_img

Artículos recientes

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...