ESC 2024 | RESHAPE-HF2: MitraClip in Heart Failure and Moderate to Severe Mitral Regurgitation

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of MitraClip in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) who had heart failure (HF) hospitalizations or elevated BNP levels (functional classes II-IV, ejection fraction 20-50%, functional MR grade 3+/4+). Patients were randomized to receive MitraClip along with optimal medical treatment (OMT) within the first 14 days, or OMT alone, and were followed up for an average of 3.5 years.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and recurrent hospitalization due to heart failure (HF), hospitalization due to HF, and quality of life changes according to the Kansas Score. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6-minute walk distance, functional class (FC), and MR improvement of MR to grade ≤2.

Unlike the COAPT and MITRA-FR studies, which focused on patients with severe MR, the patients in RESHAPE-HF2 had moderate to severe secondary MR with an effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) of 0.23 cm².

The results showed a 36% relative risk reduction in the PEP (RR 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.85; p=0.002). The reduction in HF hospitalizations was even more significant (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.42-0.82; p=0.002).

Lea también: ESC 2024 | QUADRO Trial: Efficacy and Safety of the First Quadruple Therapy Single Pill in Resistant Hypertension Patients.

Additionally, the Kansas score change significantly favored the MitraClip group (difference of 10.9 points; p<0.001). MR improvement to grade ≤2 was notably superior in the MitraClip group (21.3%; 95% CI 10.7-45.8; p<0.001).

In conclusion, the authors suggest that usng MitraClip in patients with HF and moderate to severe MR could reduce HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality.

Presented by Stefan D. Anker at the Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30-September 2, London, England.  


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....