Angiography-Derived Index of Microvascular Resistance and its Prognostic Value in Patients with NSTEMI

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) continues to be associated with high morbidity and mortality, despite significant advancements in its treatment over the years. Patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are quite varied as regards their characteristics, clinical manifestations, and outcomes, which highlights the importance of identifying those at high risk. Several studies have shown that the prognosis of these patients is significantly affected by coronary microvascular damage.

The index of microvascular resistance (IMR) is a reliable and reproducible technique for the quantitative assessment of microvascular function. However, its application remains limited due to the complexity and cost of its measurement. 

Angiography-derived IMR (angio IMR), an innovative wire-free technology, has been developed to facilitate the rapid calculation of IMR in patients undergoing coronary angiography, allowing for the quantification of microcirculation in these patients. Several studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of angio IMR in predicting outcomes in patients with AMI with coronary arteries without obstructive lesions, as well as in those with chronic coronary syndromes. However, there is no data on this tool in patients with NSTEMI.

The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of angio IMR in patients with NSTEMI after a percutaneous intervention. The primary endpoint (PEP) was the 2-year rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, heart failure rehospitalization, reinfarction, and treated-vessel revascularization.

Read also: ENVISAGE-TAVI AF Trial: What Anticoagulant Should We Use?

The study included a total of 2212 patients, of which 206 had an angio IMR >25, while 2006 had an angio IMR ≤25. The mean age was approximately 63 years, and most subjects were men. The mean angio IMR after angioplasty was 20.63. Patients with an angio IMR >25 experienced a higher rate of MACE compared with those with an angio IMR ≤25 (32.52% vs. 9.37%; P < 0.001). After angioplasty, an angio IMR >25 was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.230; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.151-5.679; P < 0.001) and showed incremental prognostic value compared with conventional risk factors (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.774 vs. 0.716; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study has shown that angio IMR is an independent predictor of MACE in patients undergoing angioplasty in a setting of NSTEMI. Incorporating angio IMR into conventional clinical risk factors significantly increased the ability to estimate MACE risk.

Original Title: Prognostic Value of Coronary Angiography–Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

Reference: Yuxuan Zhang, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2024.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Acute Coronary Syndrome with Multivessel Disease: Best Revascularization Strategy

The gold standard treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), especially acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is primary angioplasty (PCI). However, 40 to 70% of ACS...

Improved Ejection Fraction in Chronic Total Occlusion?

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) represent a significant challenge in the current clinical practice, seeing as CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complex and involves...

Timing in Complete Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndrome: BIOVASC 2-Year Followup

The concept of complete revascularization (CR) has been comprehensively studied, leading to diverse approaches and debates on optimal timing.  The BIOVASC trial explored the ideal...

DCB-BIF Trial: Randomized Study of Side Branch Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Following Provisional Stenting

Coronary bifurcations present technical challenges that should be addressed for adequate coronary geometry. The first treatment option for complex coronary bifurcations (according to the...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Acute Coronary Syndrome with Multivessel Disease: Best Revascularization Strategy

The gold standard treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), especially acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is primary angioplasty (PCI). However, 40 to 70% of ACS...

Improved Ejection Fraction in Chronic Total Occlusion?

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) represent a significant challenge in the current clinical practice, seeing as CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is complex and involves...

TAVR and Surgical Bailout: Temporal Trends and Clinical Implications

The evolution of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), both regarding its planning and execution, has resulted in minimally invasive interventions with high safety levels....