Impact of Iliofemoral Disease on Post TAVR Clinical Outcomes: HOSTILE Score Validation

At present, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown safe and effective for treating severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in high-surgical-risk patients. Moreover, its use is expanding to those with intermediate and low risk. However, vascular complications remain the most frequent issue in transfemoral-access TAVR. This is why proper anatomical evaluation of the iliofemoral tree is crucial.

Acceso retrógrado mediante la arteria tibial para el tratamiento de oclusiones en territorio femoropoplíteo: ¿es una estrategia segura?

The HOSTILE score was recently developed to quantify atherosclerosis and assess the risk of complications in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing TAVR. It integrates both the extent (number of lesions, lesion length, and minimum lumen diameter) and the complexity (tortuosity, calcification, and obstruction) of the iliofemoral arterial tree.

The aim of this prospective registry was to validate the HOSTILE score as a predictor of vascular complications after TAVR. Of the 2,023 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR between March 2014 and June 2022, 106 (5.2%) experienced vascular complications at the puncture site, and 28 (1.4%) had complications outside the puncture site. Patient mean age was 81, average STS score was 3.5, and 49.1% of participants were women. In most cases, balloon-expandable valves were used, and the most commonly employed percutaneous closure device was the ProGlide.

The HOSTILE score was significantly higher in patients who experienced vascular complications vs those who did not (P < 0.001). A higher body mass index (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.50) and the use of Prostar (OR: 6.03; 95% CI: 2.23-16.30) or MANTA devices (OR: 6.18; 95% CI: 2.67-14.27), vs ProGlide, were independent predictors of complications at the puncture site. Additionally, higher HOSTILE scores (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.55-2.35) and female sex (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.12-6.42) were associated with an increased risk of vascular complications outside the puncture site.

Read also: Results of the PROSPECT II Substudy: Relationship Between In-Stent or Stent Edge-Related Lipid-Rich Plaque and Adverse Clinical Events After PCI in Patients with MI.

The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting vascular complications at the puncture site resulted 0.554, and 0.829 for complications outside the puncture site.

Conclusion

The HOSTILE score is useful for predicting vascular complications outside the puncture site after TAVR. A comprehensive approach is necessary to further reduce post-procedural access-related vascular complications.

Original Title: Impact of Severity and Extent of Iliofemoral Atherosclerosis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing TAVR.

Reference: Masaaki Nakas MD et al JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...