TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative for treating a compromised side branch. However, the benefit of DCBs in coronary bifurcations has not yet been fully established.

The aim of this study was to find out whether the use of DCBs vs non-compliant balloons (NCBs) might improve clinical outcomes in side branch stenting using the provisional stent technique.

Primary endpoint was a composite of target lesion failure (TLF), including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel ischemia-driven revascularization. Secondary endpoints were the individual primary end components and stent thrombosis.

A total of 784 patients were randomized. 391 received DCBs and 393 NCBs. Mean patient age was 63, and they were mostly men. The most frequent clinical presentation was unstable angina, followed by non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The primary outcome was seen in 7.2% of DCB patients and 12.5% NCB patients (HR 0.56, 95% CI [0.65-0.88]; p = 0.013).

Read also: TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

There were no significant interactions at subgroup analysis, though greater benefits were seen in patients over 65 years and in bifurcations not involving the left main coronary artery.

Conclusions  

This study showed that the use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the side branch, within the context of the provisional stenting, resulted in lower risk of target lesion failure (TLF) at 1-year follow-up vs non-compliant balloons (NCBs).

Original Title: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for side branch during provisional stenting: the prospective, multicenter, randomized DCB-BIF Trial.

Reference: Shao-Liang Chen, MD et al TCT 2024.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...