TCT 2024 | Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: What Should Be our Approach?

Approximately 3% of the population over 65 years old has aortic stenosis. Current guidelines recommend valve replacement for patients with symptoms or an ejection fraction <50%.

TCT 2024 | Utilización de balones cubiertos de fármacos para el tratamiento de la rama lateral en técnica de stent provisional

However, there is a significant group of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. As such, they are advised to undergo clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. While there are some available studies regarding this scenario, current data is inconclusive.

The EARLY TAVR study—a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial—included 911 patients; of these, 455 underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and the rest were assigned to clinical follow-up (CF). The transcatheter aortic valve used was the SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra (Edwards Lifesciences).

The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization.

Both groups had similar characteristics: the average age was 76 years, 30% of subjects were women, and the STS mortality score was 1.8%; 81% of patients had hypertension, 26% had diabetes, 5% had a history of heart attack, 4.2% had experienced a stroke, 14% had atrial fibrillation, 3% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and 6% had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min.

Read also: TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA.

The mean ejection fraction was 67%, the aortic valve area was 0.9 cm², the mean gradient was 45 mmHg, the flow velocity was 4.6 m/s, and 8.5% of cases involved bicuspid valves.

With a follow-up of 3.8 (2.5-5) years, the PE favored the TAVR group (26.8% vs. 45.3%; hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.63; p <0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality (8.4% vs. 9.2%) or stroke (4.2% vs. 6.3%), but there were fewer unplanned cardiovascular rehospitalizations in the TAVR group (20.9% vs. 41.7%).

Crossover to surgery in the clinical follow-up group was 86% at 3 years and 96% at 5 years.

Conclusion

Among patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, TAVR proved to be a superior strategy to clinical follow-up in reducing the incidence of death, stroke, or unplanned cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Original Title: Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis. EARLY TAVR Trial.

Reference: P. Généreux, et al NEJM, October 28 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405880.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....