ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic.

The use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices continues under debate, seeing as the several analyses conducted so far have failed to show conclusive or significant results as regards effectiveness. 

The BHF PROTECT-TAVI included 7,601 patients undergoing TAVI: 3,798 were treated with the SENTINEL device, while the rest formed the control group.

The primary endpoint was stroke within 72 hours after procedure or before hospital discharge.

Population mean age was 81, and 39% were women. Mean EUROSCORE was 2.4%. Regarding comorbidities: 68% had hypertension, 20% diabetes, 8% TIA, 6% previous stroke, 33% coronary artery disease, 13% heart failure, 33% atrial fibrillation, 33.5% peripheral vascular disease, 13% aortic arch abnormalities (including bovine arch), and 8% bicuspid aorta.

Read also: ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Ejection fraction was <30% in 5.5% of patients and 30% to 49% in 18%. Mean gradient was 43 mmHg. Nearly half of patients showed aortic annulus severe calcification, and 4% showed outflow tract calcification.

No significant differences were observed in primary end point, with 2.1% stroke incidence among CEP patients and 2.2% among control group patients (difference: –0.02 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.68 to 0.63; p=0.94). Also, there were no differences in severe stroke incidence (0.5% vs. 0.5%; difference: 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.3 to 0.3), and most strokes occurred within the first 24 hours after procedure.

Read also: ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies.

Likewise, no differences were observed in disabling stroke between weeks 6 and 8 after TAVI (1.2% vs. 1.4%; difference: –0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.7 to 0.4), or mortality within 72 hours, during hospitalization, or at 8 weeks.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing TAVI, the routine use of cerebral protection devices did not reduce stroke incidence within the first 72 hours.

Original Title: Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation.

Reference: Rajesh K. Kharbanda, et al. NEJM DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415120.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...