ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic.

The use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices continues under debate, seeing as the several analyses conducted so far have failed to show conclusive or significant results as regards effectiveness. 

The BHF PROTECT-TAVI included 7,601 patients undergoing TAVI: 3,798 were treated with the SENTINEL device, while the rest formed the control group.

The primary endpoint was stroke within 72 hours after procedure or before hospital discharge.

Population mean age was 81, and 39% were women. Mean EUROSCORE was 2.4%. Regarding comorbidities: 68% had hypertension, 20% diabetes, 8% TIA, 6% previous stroke, 33% coronary artery disease, 13% heart failure, 33% atrial fibrillation, 33.5% peripheral vascular disease, 13% aortic arch abnormalities (including bovine arch), and 8% bicuspid aorta.

Read also: ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Ejection fraction was <30% in 5.5% of patients and 30% to 49% in 18%. Mean gradient was 43 mmHg. Nearly half of patients showed aortic annulus severe calcification, and 4% showed outflow tract calcification.

No significant differences were observed in primary end point, with 2.1% stroke incidence among CEP patients and 2.2% among control group patients (difference: –0.02 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.68 to 0.63; p=0.94). Also, there were no differences in severe stroke incidence (0.5% vs. 0.5%; difference: 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.3 to 0.3), and most strokes occurred within the first 24 hours after procedure.

Read also: ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies.

Likewise, no differences were observed in disabling stroke between weeks 6 and 8 after TAVI (1.2% vs. 1.4%; difference: –0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.7 to 0.4), or mortality within 72 hours, during hospitalization, or at 8 weeks.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing TAVI, the routine use of cerebral protection devices did not reduce stroke incidence within the first 72 hours.

Original Title: Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation.

Reference: Rajesh K. Kharbanda, et al. NEJM DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415120.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

ACVC 2026 | BOX Substudy: Mean Arterial Pressure Targets in Cardiogenic Shock After OHCA

Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock following ischemic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA-AMICS) remains an unresolved issue, particularly regarding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...