One-Year Mortality Trends Following TAVR: STS/ACC TVT Registry Outcomes

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has quickly consolidated as a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. At present, over 70,000 procedures are carried out every year in 700+ centers across the US. Technological advances, increased institutional and operator experience, and reduced risk profiles have all significantly contributed to TAVR outcomes.  

However, the impact of changes in patient demographics and risk profile on cause of death (CdM) and cause-specific mortality after TAVR remains uncertain. Pivotal clinical trials have reported the proportion of cardiac or cardiovascular-related deaths at one-year post-procedure has ranged from 33.3% to 80.0% of total deaths. Meanwhile, CURRENT AS registry outcomes (Contemporary Outcomes after Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients with Severe AS) have shown that, during an approximately 3-year followup, of 1,449 deaths in 3,815 patients with severe aortic stenosis, 55.3 % were attributed to cardiac cause and 44.7 % to non-cardiac cause. Infections and malignancies were the most common non-cardiac causes of death.

The aim of this registry was to look at cause of death and temporal trend predictors of cause-specific mortality after TAVR, as well as to identify factors associated to cardiac and non-cardiac deaths. 

Primary end point was cause-specific death one year after TAVR, including in-hospital and discharge mortality. 

36,877 patients were analyzed, mean age 82, mostly men. Mean STS was 6.8. Among the patients who died within one year of TAVR and for whom cause-of-death data were available, 11,560 (31.3%) died from cardiac causes and 25,317 (68.7%) from non-cardiac causes.

Read also: Hyper-Adducted Right Radial Access vs. Left Radial Access: Aiming for Lower Daily Radiation Exposure.

Initially, adjusted risks of cardiac and non-cardiac deaths at one year after TAVR declined between 2012 and 2017 (adjusted HR per year: 0,95 [CI 95 %: 0,92–0,97] and 0,92 [CI 95 %: 0,90–0,93], respectively), followed by an increase between 2018 and 2022 (adjusted HR per year: 1.07 [CI 95 %: 1.05–1.09] and 1.22 [CI 95 %: 1.20–1.24], respectively).

Independent predictors of cardiac and non-cardiac deaths were: >80 years, comorbidities, poor functional status, non-elective procedures, non-femoral approach and hospital complications. 

Conclusion

Non cardiac causes represent most of deaths within the first year after TAVR. There was initial decline in risk-adjusted mortality rate, both cardiac and non-cardiac, between 2012 and 2018, followed by an increase between 2019 and 2022. Several non-modifiable factors (demographics, comorbidities) and modifiable (access site, hospital complications) were associated with higher risk of death at one year after TAVR. 

Further study is required to fully understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TAVR outcomes at institutional and individual level in the US, also to be able to continue monitoring total and specific mortality trends in the post pandemic era. 

Original Title: Temporal Trends in 1- Year Cause- Specific Mortality After TAVR Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

Reference: Dhaval Kolte, MD, PHD, MPH et al JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...