EuroPCR 2025 | 10-Year Follow-up of DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI: Complete vs. Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI with Multivessel Disease

The DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI trial included 627 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), all with at least one angiographically significant non-culprit lesion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either FFR-guided complete revascularization or culprit-only PCI.

The original study was published in 2015, and in this opportunity, the 10-year follow-up was presented, assessing a primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or repeat revascularization.

At 10 years, the culprit-only strategy had an event rate of 54%, while the complete revascularization group had an incidence of 45%, showing a 24% reduction in the primary composite outcome (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60–0.94; p=0.014).

Event distribution analysis revealed that the reduction was mainly driven by fewer repeat revascularizations (HR 0.62), particularly in non-culprit vessels (HR 0.48).

In absolute terms, there was a cumulative reduction of 13 events every 100 treated patients.

Read also: EuroPCR 2025 | Angiography- vs. Physiology-Guided PCI in TAVI Candidates (FAITAVI).

Therefore, the authors concluded that FFR-guided complete revascularization in STEMI patients with MVD can be safely performed and results in a significant long-term reduction in events, mainly due to fewer revascularization procedures.

Presented by T. Engstrom during the Major Late Breaking Trials session, EuroPCR 2025, May 21, Paris, France.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve...

After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who experience a major bleeding event represents a complex clinical scenario in which percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)...