Use of OCT in Calcified Lesions: Results from a Subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV

Coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as it is associated with suboptimal stent expansion, higher complication rates, and an increased risk of long-term adverse events. Intracoronary imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), enables accurate calcium quantification, facilitates adequate lesion preparation, and optimizes stent implantation.

In this prespecified subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV, the impact of OCT guidance versus conventional angiography was assessed in patients with moderately or severely calcified coronary lesions.

A total of 1,082 patients from the main trial with single treated lesions and moderate/severe calcification confirmed by a core lab were included. The OCT-guided strategy was compared with angiography guidance, with the primary clinical endpoint (PCE) being target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years —a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The primary imaging endpoint was post-PCI minimum stent area (MSA).

OCT-guided PCI was associated with a larger post-procedure MSA (5.57 ± 1.86 vs. 5.33 ± 1.78 mm²; p=0.03) and better stent expansion. It also showed lower rates of edge dissection, significant malapposition, and focal residual disease in reference segments.

Read also: Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Positive Coronary CT Angiography: Implications of Invasive Physiological Studies.

Clinically, the OCT-guided strategy significantly reduced 2-year events: lower TVF (6.8% vs. 9.7%; adjHR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.40–0.96; p=0.03), fewer serious MACE (2.8% vs. 4.7%; adjHR 0.49; p=0.03), reduced target vessel myocardial infarction (1.9% vs. 4.0%; adjHR 0.36; p=0.01), and fewer stent thromboses (0.2% vs. 1.5%; adjHR 0.11; p=0.04). A significant reduction in serious adverse events at 30 days was also observed.

Conclusions

In patients with angiographically relevant coronary calcification, OCT-guided PCI demonstrated sustained 2-year clinical benefits, attributable to better lesion preparation and stent optimization. These findings support the use of OCT in this complex patient subgroup.

Original Title: Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

Reference: Ali ZA, Shin D, Vijayvergiya R, Gawalkar AA, Shlofmitz RA, Alfonso F, Calligaris G, Canova P, Sakai K, Price MJ, Leistner D, Prati F, Mintz G, Matsumura M, McGreevy RJ, McNutt RW, Nie H, Buccola J, Landmesser U, Maehara A, Stone GW. Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial. Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3201-3210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf331. PMID: 40470719; PMCID: PMC12369818.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...